Teams

Grear/Memphis

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 6.5 18 & Over Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-23vs Bann/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesMeredith Canale / Laura Beth Gabriel vs Cheryl Body / Autumn Rich6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDory Gaston / Rebekah Kingsley vs Morgan Pippen / Victoria Jackson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Smith / Meade Carlisle vs Omitope Taylor / Christine Anderson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-16vs McDaniel/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesMeredith Canale / Christian Turner vs Jessica McDaniel / Mackenzie Harbin6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmy Poag / Dory Gaston vs Allie Sloane / Hart Kelman6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlaina Ward / Courtney Vest vs Jessie Williams / Katie Kirton6-1, 6-2
2026-08-08vs Lunsford/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Beth Gabriel / Jennifer Gladstone vs Lauren Cunningham / Breeana Crouch0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMariangeles Grear / Sarah Heard vs Lauren Heard / Danielle Brewer3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMegan Sousoulas / Mary Smith vs Amy Smythe / Maria Foley5-7, 5-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Rebekah Kingsley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Laura Beth Gabriel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Meredith Canale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Dory Gaston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Amy Poag
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Meade Carlisle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Sarah Heard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Alaina Ward
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Courtney Vest
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Christian Turner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Mariangeles Grear
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Meera Wright
published
2.48
Megan Sousoulas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meredith Canale + Laura Beth Gabriel4352% games+0.7% vs expected
Laura Beth Gabriel + Amy Poag213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebekah Kingsley
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Laura Beth Gabriel
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.08
Meredith Canale
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Dory Gaston
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Amy Poag
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Meade Carlisle
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
Sarah Heard
12W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Alaina Ward
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Courtney Vest
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Christian Turner
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
Mariangeles Grear
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Meera Wright
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
Megan Sousoulas
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.