Teams

Nicholson

2023 Anne Arundel Adult 40 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.46 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-30vs McClatchyWon 21
W#1 DoublesEve Helmer / Tatiana Loboda vs DONNA FOX / Lisa Scott6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Beling / Emily Bear vs Marla LaHaye / Cathy Officer5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiane Sweeney / Joi Remoll vs Sue Fisher / Buthaina Shukri0-6, 0-6
2023-07-26vs McClatchySplit 22
W#1 DoublesTara Okieffe / Maureen Dupcak vs Cathy Shields / Sue Fisher6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDina Esterowitz vs DONNA FOX6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Beling / Diane Sweeney vs Lisa Scott / Barbara Linke6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRoselle Nicholson / Holly Ruckman vs Shelena Sanderson / Nannette Littlejohn2-6, 6-7
2023-07-22vs McClatchyWon 31
W#1 DoublesGeraldine Klauber / Eve Helmer vs Barbara Linke / Sue Fisher6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAnne Jagodits vs Michele Campbell6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMaureen Dupcak / Tara Okieffe vs Marla LaHaye / Cathy Officer4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRoselle Nicholson / Joi Remoll vs Shelena Sanderson / Wendy Heger4-6, 5-7
2023-07-18vs McClatchyWon 21
W#1 SinglesDina Esterowitz vs Michele Campbell6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRoselle Nicholson / Maureen Dupcak vs Cathy Officer / Marla LaHaye6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDiane Sweeney / Karen Beling vs Buthaina Shukri / Nannette Littlejohn7-6, 6-2
2023-07-09vs McClatchyWon 40
W#1 DoublesTatiana Loboda / Maureen Dupcak vs DONNA FOX / Cathy Shields6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnne Jagodits vs Wendy Heger6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTara Okieffe / Traci Smith vs Sue Fisher / Lisa Luray7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRoselle Nicholson / Holly Ruckman vs Nannette Littlejohn / Michele Campbell6-4, 7-6
2023-07-06vs McClatchyWon 40
W#1 DoublesCaryn Vollmer / Eve Helmer vs Cathy Shields / Sue Fisher4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnne Jagodits vs Michele Campbell6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTara Okieffe / Karen Beling vs Cathy Officer / Wendy Heger7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRoselle Nicholson / Tatiana Loboda vs Buthaina Shukri / Nannette Littlejohn6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Eve Helmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.48
Caryn Vollmer
published 4.5
4.34
Maureen Dupcak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.26
Tara Okieffe
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.23
Geraldine Klauber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Anne Jagodits
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Dina Esterowitz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Karen Beling
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.05
Tatiana Loboda
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.84
Joi Remoll
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.76
Roselle Nicholson
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.70
Diane Sweeney
published 4
Holly Ruckman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Beling + Maureen Dupcak8163% games+7.3% vs expected
Karen Beling + Tara Okieffe13557% games−4.7% vs expected
Maureen Dupcak + Tara Okieffe7353% games−7.3% vs expected
Joi Remoll + Roselle Nicholson9955% gamesnot enough data
Roselle Nicholson + Tatiana Loboda10456% gamesnot enough data
Maureen Dupcak + Tatiana Loboda3350% gamesnot enough data
Dina Esterowitz + Tara Okieffe3255% gamesnot enough data
Joi Remoll + Maureen Dupcak3262% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Eve Helmer
276W–134L career · type D · 3 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.49
4.5
Caryn Vollmer
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
4.48
4.5
Maureen Dupcak
103W–61L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
4.34
4.5
Tara Okieffe
96W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Geraldine Klauber
149W–91L career · 1 line in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Anne Jagodits
208W–213L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Dina Esterowitz
53W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Karen Beling
76W–50L career · 4 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Tatiana Loboda
178W–130L career · 3 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Joi Remoll
143W–83L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.84
4.5
Roselle Nicholson
97W–72L career · 5 lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
3.76
4
Diane Sweeney
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
Holly Ruckman
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.