Teams

SDNC 3.5 Rancho Santa Fe TC/ Case (2:3)

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC · SDNC - Women- 3.5WD

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesAnne Case / Minerva Walz vs ALEXIS MCCANDLESS / Cari Massaad6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristine Tangarie / Krista Young vs Donna Berwanger / Michelle Kearney6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChristine Tangarie / Krista Young vs Paula Brust / Kelly Campbell6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMinerva Walz / Allison Williams vs Ryoko Adachi / Junko Toda0-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesDiana Knickrehm / Minerva Walz vs Beth Piper / Laney Mesquita7-5, 6-4
2022-04-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesMinerva Walz / Allison Williams vs Leanne Kiviharju / Belinda Foley6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChristine Tangarie / Allison Williams vs Sandra Chwala / Laura Tenney6-3, 6-4
2022-04-04vs SDNC 3.5 RBCTC/ Nelson (2:3)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesChristine Tangarie / Martha Dominguez vs Christi McClain / Kelly Murphy5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women- 3.5WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Hilary Loretta
published 4
3.68
3.39
Minerva Walz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Anne Case
published 3.5
3.31
Allison Williams
published 3.5
Courtney LeBeau
published 3.5
3.22
Diana Clark
published 3.5
3.22
Krista Young
published
3.17
Molly Tanner
published
3.10
Christine Tangarie
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Juliana Guillory
published
LJ Nicholas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Minerva Walz + Katherine Nakamura8257% gamesnot enough data
Krista Young + Molly Tanner3250% gamesnot enough data
Allison Williams + Minerva Walz224 matchesnot enough data
Allison Williams + Krista Young123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hilary Loretta
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Katherine Nakamura
40W–29L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Minerva Walz
55W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Anne Case
44W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Allison Williams
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Courtney LeBeau
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Diana Clark
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Krista Young
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Molly Tanner
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Christine Tangarie
63W–90L career · 4 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Juliana Guillory
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
LJ Nicholas
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Frances Morilak
16W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.