Teams

KY/LOU/DALTON

2025 USTA FALL 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-21vs KY/LOU/KELLERMAN/WINEBRENNERLost 01
L#1 SinglesLisa Steen vs Gina Rosiello1-6, 2-6
2025-11-16vs KY/LOU/HARRIS/MASONWon 10
W#1 SinglesLisa Steen vs Mi Pham6-3, 6-1
2025-10-11vs KY/LOU/SUNLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatie Archer / Mechelle Kaufman vs Christine Sillings / Solongo Ganchuluun6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSheryl Gordon / Laci Pauley vs Martha Hudson / Andrea Schnurr3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Lisa Steen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Karen Weathers
published
3.02
Mechelle Kaufman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Hayley Davis
published
2.72
Daryl Alfrey
published 3
2.59
Sara Rocke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Lindagarde Dalton
published
2.32
Yana Feygin
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.31
Laci Pauley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.27
Samantha Oerther
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.20
Sophia Mobley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sheryl Gordon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mechelle Kaufman + Karen Weathers2354% gamesnot enough data
Samantha Oerther + Sara Rocke4162% gamesnot enough data
Samantha Oerther + Sophia Mobley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lisa Steen
173W–163L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Karen Weathers
24W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.13
Mechelle Kaufman
38W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Hayley Davis
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Daryl Alfrey
8W–17L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Sara Rocke
18W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%26%74%
2.59
Lindagarde Dalton
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Yana Feygin
13W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
Laci Pauley
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31
Samantha Oerther
10W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Sophia Mobley
8W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Sheryl Gordon
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.