Teams

Scarborough

2026 SUMMER Combo Women · Summer 8.5W Combo

10 players · average NTRP 4.12 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Summer 8.5W Combo have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Heather Hermanns
published 4.5
4.05
Tara Hayes
published
3.83
Lily Duan
published
3.82
Kelli Elsea
published
3.76
Lacey Urban
published
3.72
Mary Borchers
published
3.63
Lianne Simeone
published
3.61
Caroline Cohn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Jaclyn Hillis
published 4
3.45
Erin Husslein
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lacey Urban + Heather Hermanns3545% games+9.0% vs expected
Heather Hermanns + Tara Hayes111247% games+5.5% vs expected
Mary Borchers + Heather Hermanns1640% games−0.6% vs expected
Erin Husslein + Heather Hermanns1439% gamesnot enough data
Kelli Elsea + Heather Hermanns1447% gamesnot enough data
Lily Duan + Tara Hayes033 matchesnot enough data
Heather Hermanns + Jaclyn Hillis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Heather Hermanns
47W–58L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.17
Tara Hayes
60W–56L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.05
Lily Duan
119W–85L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.83
Kelli Elsea
170W–75L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
Lacey Urban
9W–14L career · no lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.76
Mary Borchers
76W–102L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
Lianne Simeone
48W–27L career · no lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.63
4
Caroline Cohn
66W–79L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Jaclyn Hillis
13W–50L career · no lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
4
Erin Husslein
15W–44L career · no lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.