Teams

3.PW.Kupfrian

2022 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-29vs 4.TOC.NarulaWon 10
W#1 SinglesCassie Hannan vs Sharon Fadelici7-6, 6-1
2022-04-26vs 1.LOCH.FinucaneWon 10
W#2 DoublesAllison Kupfrian / Stephanie Buchanan vs Gwen Louis / Susan Bavisotto6-4, 6-3
2022-04-25vs 5.TOHS.BaldygaWon 10
W#1 SinglesSarah van Saun vs Blair Timberlake6-2, 6-3
2022-04-01vs 2.MD.RothSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSiobhan Frieary / Sarah van Saun vs Rochelle Roth / Becky King2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAllison Kupfrian / Anna Harper vs Lindsey Guccia / Erin Riddick6-3, 7-6
2022-03-18vs 4.TOC.NarulaWon 20
W#1 DoublesSiobhan Frieary / Kimberly Hall vs Daniela Barriga / Sue Mooney6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCassie Hannan / Leslie Singer vs MacOn Hollister / Andrea Dusina6-0, 6-1
2022-03-11vs 5.TOHS.BaldygaWon 20
W#1 DoublesCassie Hannan / Kim Burgwyn vs Kristin Baldyga / Elizabeth Parrish6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah van Saun / Stephanie Buchanan vs Blair Timberlake / Kris Medford6-0, 6-2
2022-03-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesAllison Kupfrian / Sarah van Saun vs Robin Cole / Lisa Kropilak6-0, 6-0
2022-02-25vs 2.MD.RothLost 01
L#1 SinglesSiobhan Frieary vs Brigette Flower2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Siobhan Frieary
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.05
Jenn Cooper
published
3.02
Kimberly Hall
published
2.90
Allison Kupfrian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.82
Sarah van Saun
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Cassie Hannan
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
Martha Priest
published
2.46
Janessa Core
published
2.04
Lisa Bradley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Kupfrian + Sarah van Saun101749% games+2.4% vs expected
Jenn Cooper + Kimberly Hall044 matchesnot enough data
Allison Kupfrian + Cassie Hannan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Siobhan Frieary
151W–73L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
Jenn Cooper
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
Kimberly Hall
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Allison Kupfrian
88W–70L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Sarah van Saun
75W–80L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Cassie Hannan
32W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
Martha Priest
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
2.51
Janessa Core
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
2.46
Lisa Bradley
1W–12L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.