Teams

McCann (Coral Reef)

2021 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Fall Night · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.71 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2020-12-08vs Cancian (Tamiami Tennis)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKim Giles / Ana Etzold vs Mirthescka Escanellas / Cecilia Pissane2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAna Veloso vs Ninoska Castrodad1-6, 4-6
2020-10-19vs Gayle (Shulas)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAlva San Sebastian / Eunice McCann vs Ivet Hernandez / Rossana OKAMURA2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2020-10-14vs Gary (Continental Park)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesAna Veloso vs Cristina Melendez0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDamarys Vega / Ana Etzold vs LINDA YUSMAN WIRTH / Maria Teresa Azucena3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2020-10-12vs Lazo-Campagna (Alper JCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesEunice McCann / Alva San Sebastian vs Barbara Garcia / Aimee Trujillo6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Claudia Viso
published 4
3.67
3.59
Damarys Vega
published 4
3.42
Kim Giles
published
3.41
Leticia Diaz
published
3.34
Eunice McCann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Ana Etzold
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Angelica Abud
published 3.5
3.16
Ana Veloso
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
SERAP CARDAK
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Etzold + Eunice McCann11458% games−7.5% vs expected
Kim Giles + Eunice McCann134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Claudia Viso
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Andrea Mientkiewicz
7W–21L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Damarys Vega
1W–7L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
Kim Giles
21W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
Leticia Diaz
78W–30L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Eunice McCann
178W–120L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Ana Etzold
166W–121L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Angelica Abud
9W–10L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Ana Veloso
54W–94L career · 2 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
SERAP CARDAK
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.