Teams

HCC - K. Kellar

2021 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over - Night · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over Women Night

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-03-08vs HCC Night Owls - B. ThompsonLost 01
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Gerlach vs Audrey Goodwin1-6, 4-6
2021-03-01vs HCC - S. WeissWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaurie Smith / Xiao Zhang vs Paige Paine / Marcy Kaufman6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCharlene Knetsch / Dong Li vs Martyne LaDuke / Laura Salzer7-6, 6-4
2021-02-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Gerlach / Asbel Giang vs Kim Ortmeier / Andrea Cammarata6-4, 6-0
2021-02-15vs HCC Night Owls - B. ThompsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Gerlach / Marcy Faircloth vs Aspen Kahl / Jennifer Garlick2-6, 3-6
2021-02-08vs HCC - S. WeissLost 01
L#2 DoublesCharlene Knetsch / Anne-Lucie Bouchard vs Dina Caputa / Julia van Diver4-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesAsbel Giang / Elizabeth Gerlach vs Sonia Patrick / Julie Martin2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-01-25vs HCC Night Owls - B. ThompsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesRebecca Burns / Lara Slatniske vs Andria Owen / Lindsey Robbins6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAsbel Giang / Laurie Smith vs Beth Thompson / Aspen Kahl2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Gerlach vs Audrey Goodwin2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-01-18vs HCC - S. WeissWon 10
W#3 DoublesCharlene Knetsch / Nicole Slater vs Martyne LaDuke / Mary Egan-Lorigan7-6, 7-6
2021-01-11vs Plant City Tennis Nut - S. PatrickLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoy Evans / Laurie Smith vs Sonia Patrick / Julie Martin3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnne-Lucie Bouchard / Lara Slatniske vs Christina Dorothy / Alejandra Sanderson2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Asbel Giang
published 4.5
4.11
Elizabeth Gerlach
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.90
Brittany Quinlan
published 4
3.85
Lara Slatniske
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
3.75
Kornelia Kis
published
3.72
Dong Li
published 4
3.62
Laurie Smith
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Anh Flinter
published 3.5
3.26
Charlene Knetsch
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Xiao Zhang
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Asbel Giang
7W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Elizabeth Gerlach
184W–98L career · 5 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
4.11
4
Brittany Quinlan
44W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Lara Slatniske
130W–79L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Anne-Lucie Bouchard
30W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
Kornelia Kis
5W–4L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Dong Li
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
Laurie Smith
232W–110L career · 3 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Anh Flinter
0W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Charlene Knetsch
106W–62L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
Xiao Zhang
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.