Teams

KY/LOU/HAWKINS

2024 USTA FALL 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.71 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-06vs KY/LOU/GROVE/WILKINSSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBounthavy Hill / Amanda Rassiga vs Laurie Moore / Robin Snook6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMei Dai vs Noel Kaufmann1-6
2024-12-01vs KY/LOU/SHIN/ROGERSSplit 11
W#1 DoublesASHLEY LILE / Bounthavy Hill vs Rebekah Cansler / Angela Beyerle7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMei Dai vs Maria Shin5-7, 0-6
2024-11-23vs KY/LOU/DAHLEM/OCONNELLWon 21
L#1 DoublesASHLEY LILE / Louisa Lewandowski vs Jennifer McMahon / Lauren Tan3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBounthavy Hill vs Toni Peterson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarey Goldstein / Emily Staggs vs Lisa Bruneau / Missy Varga6-2, 6-4
2024-11-17vs KY/LOU/ROBY/BOWLINGLost 02
L#1 DoublesBounthavy Hill / Amanda Rassiga vs Denise Roby / Renee Armstrong1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarey Goldstein / Kate Weber vs Cheryl Dortch / Lindsey Burbridge2-6, 3-6
2024-11-09vs KY/LOU/WEBBER/ GOODWINWon 21
L#1 DoublesASHLEY LILE / Emily Staggs vs Abby Schuhmann / Rona Martins4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBounthavy Hill vs Caroline Ballard3-1
W#2 DoublesKatie Dudas / Kate Weber vs Shelby Russell / Christine Gilmore6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-03vs KY/LOU/PRZEWORSKI/REEDERLost 01
L#1 DoublesBounthavy Hill / Mei Dai vs Andi Ramser / Swapna Deo6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-10-20vs KY/LOU/DEATRICK/ADWELLSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEmily Staggs / Kate Weber vs Jenny Jokinen / Ashley McCoy6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMei Dai vs Sara DeSanctis0-6, 1-6
2024-10-12vs KY/LOU/HOSTETLERLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatie Dudas / Emily Staggs vs Mary Grace Amato / Carmen Amato6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBounthavy Hill vs Heather Lentz5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMaria Hawkins / ASHLEY LILE vs Kellee Dicks / Lana McIntyre6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LOU/GROVE/WILKINS7119515160
2KY/LOU/ROBY/BOWLING7117717166
3KY/LOU/HOSTETLER6318923217
4KY/LOU/OCONNELL5315921193
5KY/LOU/WEBBER/ GOODWIN44141023200
6KY/LOU/RECHTER/MORRIS4491533242
7KY/LOU/HAWKINS35101432237
8KY/LOU/DEATRICK/ADWELL3581635234
9KY/LOU/SHIN/ROGERS2691531227
10KY/LOU/DAHLEM/OCONNELL1862144284

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Katie Dudas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Kate Weber
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Amanda Rassiga
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
ASHLEY LILE
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Bounthavy Hill
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 4
3.32
Ashley Butler
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Ashley Wilhem
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Katie Shrewsberry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Louisa Lewandowski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Emily Staggs
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Carey Goldstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Lindsey Underhill
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.04
Mei Dai
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carey Goldstein + Kate Weber3351% games+2.3% vs expected
Katie Shrewsberry + Louisa Lewandowski3244% games−3.1% vs expected
Louisa Lewandowski + Carey Goldstein3640% games−8.8% vs expected
Louisa Lewandowski + Kate Weber3444% gamesnot enough data
Kate Weber + Katie Dudas3259% gamesnot enough data
Louisa Lewandowski + Emily Staggs314 matchesnot enough data
Carey Goldstein + Emily Staggs404 matchesnot enough data
ASHLEY LILE + Louisa Lewandowski033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Dudas
26W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
Kate Weber
25W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Amanda Rassiga
28W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
ASHLEY LILE
19W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Bounthavy Hill
42W–78L career · 7 lines in 2024
44%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Ashley Butler
25W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Ashley Wilhem
17W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
Katie Shrewsberry
16W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Louisa Lewandowski
28W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Emily Staggs
10W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Carey Goldstein
23W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Lindsey Underhill
17W–37L career · 5 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.16
Mei Dai
43W–68L career · 8 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.