Teams

RID SULLIVENT

2024 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Saturday Ladies 2.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Saturday Ladies 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Ashley Berzon
published 3
2.51
Kelly Dishman
published
2.42
Stephanie Sullivent
published
2.35
Rachel Payne
published
2.24
Lisa Grider
published
Tanya Henderson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ashley Berzon
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Kelly Dishman
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
2.51
Stephanie Sullivent
5W–16L career · no lines in 2024
0%71%29%
2.42
Rachel Payne
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%86%14%
2.35
Lisa Grider
0W–9L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.24
Tanya Henderson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.