Teams

Crawley

2021 Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Women 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-26vs PenguinsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichele Weiss / Andrea Smolen vs Donna Boston / Cornelia Wikar7-6, 5-2
W#2 DoublesNa Yi / Anne McKissick vs Kim Herman / Cynthia Wofford6-3, 6-1
2021-06-19vs PenguinsLost 01
L#2 DoublesSophia Crawley / Andrea Smolen vs Kimberly Gowen / Shannon Afarin4-6, 0-6
2021-06-05vs PenguinsLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrea Smolen / Kay Kalber vs Julie Grignon / Kim Herman4-6, 1-6
2021-05-23vs PenguinsLost 01
L#2 DoublesSophia Crawley / Andrea Smolen vs Cornelia Wikar / Gail Martinez Waters6-7, 3-6
2021-05-22vs PenguinsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrea Smolen / Na Yi vs Julie Grignon / Carly Dent6-4, 6-2
2021-05-15vs PenguinsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnne McKissick / Shannon Biggs vs Julie Grignon / Teresa Taylor6-2, 6-4
2021-04-17vs PenguinsWon 10
W#1 DoublesShannon Biggs / Anne McKissick vs Cynthia Wofford / Julie Grignon6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Xenia Baranova
published 4
3.74
Katie Tetrault
published 4
3.53
Na Yi
published 4
2.77
Anne McKissick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Andrea Smolen
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.75
Shannon Biggs
published
2.54
Linda Harrell
published
2.46
Carol Bernard
published 3
2.41
Kay Kalber
published
Sophia Crawley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Biggs + Andrea Smolen4251% games+7.0% vs expected
Katie Tetrault + Na Yi8456% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Smolen + Anne McKissick303 matchesnot enough data
Katie Tetrault + Xenia Baranova303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Xenia Baranova
204W–68L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%24%
3.91
4
Katie Tetrault
144W–98L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Na Yi
198W–103L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.53
3
Anne McKissick
94W–129L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Andrea Smolen
170W–219L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
Shannon Biggs
18W–30L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
Linda Harrell
7W–13L career · no lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Carol Bernard
0W–6L career · no lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
2.46
Kay Kalber
5W–12L career · no lines in 2021
0%76%24%
2.41
Sophia Crawley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.