Teams

Laurel Oak Old Guys

2025 Sarasota Combo 50 & Over Fall · 7.5 M Wednesday Eve

10 players · average NTRP 3.80 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-03vs LWN BautistaWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Rosenberg / Joe Malave vs Jeff Camp / Timothy Smith6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDave Barcomb / Bradley Sutter vs Michael Poppler / Steve Bautista6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-19vs Azario EsplanadeLost 01
L#2 DoublesMike Brielmaier / Joe Malave vs Todd Harrison / Dan Rosner6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-11-05vs Sarasota/Johnson/50&Over7.5MWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoe Malave / Jim Capazola vs Stephen Johnson / Bob Abraham6-2, 6-2
2025-10-29vs Sarasota/RisquezSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJim Capazola / David Doctora vs Peter Laughlin / Grover Windsor4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDave Barcomb / Joe Malave vs Kip Schoonover / Scott Temple6-2, 6-4
2025-10-22vs LWN BautistaLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Doctora / Joe Malave vs Michael Poppler / Tom Dughi6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-15vs Azario EsplanadeWon 10
W#2 DoublesJim Capazola / Joe Malave vs Branden Ritchey / Jeffrey Silverman6-1, 6-2
2025-10-01vs Sarasota/Johnson/50&Over7.5MLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoe Malave / Bradley Sutter vs Stephen Johnson / Bob Abraham1-6, 4-6
2025-09-24vs Sarasota/RisquezSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJim Capazola / David Doctora vs Gustavo Risquez / Skip Rowe6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDave Barcomb / Jonah Brum vs Steven Totterdale / Peter Laughlin3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 M Wednesday Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Dave Barcomb
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Joe Malave
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.43
David Doctora
published 3.5
3.41
David Rosenberg
published 4
3.38
Bradley Sutter
published 3.5
3.22
Jonah Brum
published
Jim Capazola
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kenneth Schwartz
published
Mike Beasley
published
Mike Brielmaier
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Barcomb + Joe Malave6352% gamesnot enough data
Kenneth Schwartz + Bradley Sutter4250% gamesnot enough data
Dave Barcomb + David Rosenberg123 matchesnot enough data
Kenneth Schwartz + Jonah Brum123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dave Barcomb
54W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Joe Malave
127W–103L career · 7 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
David Doctora
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
4
David Rosenberg
11W–17L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Bradley Sutter
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Jonah Brum
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
Jim Capazola
78W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kenneth Schwartz
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Beasley
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Brielmaier
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.