← Teams

CRRC-Newcomb

2023 Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.61 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Doug Matheson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.65
Steve Swan
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.57
Thomas Turnbull
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.29
Trina Newcomb
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.28
Robin Kaukonen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Sibyl Jarrett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Dana McKillop
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Ryan Owens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Robert Glenn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2023-03-11Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesRobin Kaukonen / Steve Swan vs Mary Green-Zwemke / Tony Moreno6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRobert Glenn / Sibyl Jarrett vs Xiaolu Huang / Steve Vanderploeg6-3, 6-0
2023-03-05Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDoug Matheson / Robin Kaukonen vs Kirsten Giacomini / Keith Abel6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesThomas Turnbull / Dana McKillop vs Kim Stevens / Stanley Mo7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRobert Glenn / Sibyl Jarrett vs Sally Murdoch / Rich Rice6-1, 6-2
2023-03-04Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRobert Glenn / Sibyl Jarrett vs D'Arcy Martin / Kari Hastings6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRyan Owens / Deb Garris vs Thomas Lockhart / Katherine Kralj6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSteve Swan / Robin Kaukonen vs Scott Eliason / Crystal Bryant6-1, 6-3
2023-02-19Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesSteve Swan / Robin Kaukonen vs Karen Mathews / Eric Anderson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDoug Matheson / Sibyl Jarrett vs Linda Graham / Donald Pettitt3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesThomas Turnbull / Deb Garris vs Babette Zielinski / Bill Rhoades6-3, 7-6
2023-02-11Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesSteve Swan / Trina Newcomb vs Sekona Taufa / Hong Allen6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesThomas Turnbull / Deb Garris vs Prasad Kenkaraseril / Karen Pickering6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRobert Glenn / Sibyl Jarrett vs Shaoping Lin / Linda Barr6-2, 6-1
2023-02-05Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesSteve Swan / Trina Newcomb vs Sushil Srivastava / Kayleen Mendenhall6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Owens / Dana McKillop vs Shannon Roarke / Gregg Palmer6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDoug Matheson / Sibyl Jarrett vs Kevin Heller / Kathleen Budnick6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-02-03Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesTrina Newcomb / Steve Swan vs Neal Burgstahler / Sally Murdoch6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDoug Matheson / Robin Kaukonen vs Rich Rice / Kristi Vargas6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRobert Glenn / Dana McKillop vs Gregory Gonzalez / Heather Dudley6-4, 6-2
2023-01-08Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesSteve Swan / Trina Newcomb vs Deepak Kumar / Mary Green-Zwemke6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDana McKillop / Doug Matheson vs Neil Soiffer / Cassia Carpio6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRobert Glenn / Robin Kaukonen vs Justin Shull / Anita Rockwell6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Doug Matheson
20W–40L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Steve Swan
28W–51L career
0%42%58%
3.65
4
Thomas Turnbull
86W–92L career
16%84%0%
3.57
3.5
Trina Newcomb
79W–57L career
1%98%1%
3.29
3.5
Robin Kaukonen
23W–53L career
1%97%2%
3.28
3.5
Sibyl Jarrett
36W–73L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Dana McKillop
23W–65L career
1%98%0%
3.24
3.5
Ryan Owens
113W–77L career
6%94%0%
3.14
3.5
Robert Glenn
117W–113L career
14%86%0%
3.07

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.