Teams

MARIN TC 18AW4.0A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

23 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Jennifer Mills
published
4.26
Elizabeth Shalev
published
4.18
Sugi Bernard
published
4.12
Kira Deguchi
published
3.98
Merilee Bordin
published
3.92
Nicole Bianchi
published
3.88
Lisa Eastlack
published
3.81
Nancy Martin
published
3.69
Francie Burkhard
published
3.68
Anne Sullivan
published 4
3.67
Michelle Douglas
published
3.63
Kris Hinckley
published
3.56
Tina Skouras
published
3.55
Debra Hakman
published 3.5
3.51
Emily Bell
published
3.35
Germana Fabbri
published
3.33
Helen Luttemo
published
3.28
Ellen Cowan
published
3.25
Margo Holt
published
3.11
Molie Malone
published
Mandy Aguero
published
Maria Mazzaferri
published
Michelle Rowley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Merilee Bordin + Kris Hinckley3263% gamesnot enough data
Tina Skouras + Anne Sullivan224 matchesnot enough data
Tina Skouras + Michelle Douglas224 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Eastlack + Emily Bell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Mills
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%20%
4.38
Elizabeth Shalev
13W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
4.26
Sugi Bernard
20W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%10%90%
4.18
Kira Deguchi
0W–13L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.12
Merilee Bordin
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.98
Nicole Bianchi
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
3.92
Lisa Eastlack
39W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
Nancy Martin
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
Francie Burkhard
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Anne Sullivan
16W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Michelle Douglas
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
Kris Hinckley
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
Tina Skouras
18W–9L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.56
3.5
Debra Hakman
9W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.55
Emily Bell
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
Germana Fabbri
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
3.35
Helen Luttemo
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Ellen Cowan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
3.28
Margo Holt
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25
Molie Malone
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
22%77%<1%
3.11
Mandy Aguero
7W–30L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maria Mazzaferri
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Rowley
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.