Teams

7 Bon Air - Reprobates - Wade

2024 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-09-11vs 4 ACAC - HallLost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Kim / Warren Smigo vs Sam Nedeff / Ben Hall7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Blackburn / Don Caffery vs Christopher Chandler / David Nedeff5-7, 4-6
2024-09-04vs 2 Woodlake EstesLost 01
L#1 DoublesWarren Smigo / Michael Blackburn vs Eric Estes / Bradley Glen1-6, 1-6
2024-08-28vs 1 MAC SnowLost 01
L#1 DoublesWarren Smigo / Michael Blackburn vs Adam Hamilton / Eric Spivack4-6, 1-6
2024-08-21vs 5 Raintree KallamSplit 11
L#1 DoublesWarren Smigo / Christopher Wade vs Seunghun Ok / Bhargavaram Kallam4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Blackburn / Don Caffery vs Gary Wills / Madhav Kidambi7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDon Caffery / Michael Blackburn vs James Holland / Bradley Snyder1-6, 3-6
2024-08-12vs 8 Ridgetop BlouchLost 01
L#2 DoublesDon Caffery / Michael Blackburn vs Dutch Jones / Robert Turner2-6, 3-6
2024-07-31vs RICHMOND - SebeticLost 02
L#1 DoublesWarren Smigo / Scott Kim vs Doug Bond / Naveen Chennupati0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Morris / Michael Blackburn vs En-Tien Chen / Brian Zollinhofer0-6, 2-6
2024-07-29vs 5 Raintree KallamLost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Kim / Warren Smigo vs Brett Sinsabaugh / Luis Rodriguez-Miranda1-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Christopher Wade
published 4
4.01
Scott Kim
published
3.77
Aric Mueller
published 4
3.72
Matthew Morris
published
3.69
Warren Smigo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Michael Blackburn
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.33
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Warren Smigo + Michael Blackburn033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Wade
9W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
4.08
Scott Kim
4W–19L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
4.01
4
Aric Mueller
13W–17L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Matthew Morris
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
3.72
4
Warren Smigo
72W–158L career · 6 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Michael Blackburn
172W–174L career · 7 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Venkatachelam Regulagedda
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.