Teams

MPTC

*2026 Houston Fall League (2025) NA - Tuesday Ladies Doubles · Open Ladies

11 players · average NTRP 4.75 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-11vs MPTC - Love AllLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlesandra Echeandia / Cindy Tiu vs Victoria Fuenmayor / Danielle Schoenly4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGenevieve Tarlton / Megan Tan vs Abby Dennett / Neha Shaw3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCrystal Fain / Kaye Williams vs Linnie Ford / Cynthia Blust3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-11-04vs Lifetime GalleriaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKimberly Elliott / Genevieve Tarlton vs Lauren Gutterman / Marina Vigil Celorio0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCrystal Fain / Cindy Tiu vs Laura Fandry / Marissa Valentine-King6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-28vs LLTC - TerminettersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCrystal Fain / Hannah Watson vs Emily Kha / Sidney Stewart3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlesandra Echeandia / Donna Miller vs Sara Wilks / Miranda Erisman6-1, 6-2
2025-10-21vs MPTC - Love AllLost 13
L#1 DoublesKimberly Elliott / Cindy Tiu vs Victoria Fuenmayor / Danielle Schoenly0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCrystal Fain / Genevieve Tarlton vs Abby Dennett / Neha Shaw2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesThao Westenhaver / Kaye Williams vs Linnie Ford / Cynthia Blust4-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesDonna Miller / Megan Tan vs Betty Richmond / Kristina Raphael6-0, 6-1
2025-10-14vs Lifetime GalleriaLost 13
L#1 DoublesGenevieve Tarlton / Cindy Tiu vs Elizabeth Crider / Marissa Valentine-King4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCrystal Fain / Kimberly Elliott vs Peyton Brotzman / Marina Vigil Celorio2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAlesandra Echeandia / Kate Davis vs Jordan Fandry / Brittany Chandler7-5, 6-0
L#4 DoublesKristin Barnes / Kaye Williams vs Lesley Ngwe Neh / Cayleigh Simpson1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-10-07vs LLTC - TerminettersWon 20
W#1 DoublesGenevieve Tarlton / Crystal Fain vs Leigh Martin / Miranda Erisman6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesThao Westenhaver / Kimberly Elliott vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-30vs MPTC - Love AllWon 31
L#1 DoublesAlesandra Echeandia / Hannah Watson vs Victoria Fuenmayor / Danielle Schoenly6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGenevieve Tarlton / Cindy Tiu vs Abby Dennett / Bianca Posada7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaye Williams / Megan Tan vs Amanda Joy / Linnie Ford4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#4 DoublesCrystal Fain / Donna Miller vs Joyce Tiong / Lina Gonzalezoviedo5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-23vs Lifetime GalleriaSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKimberly Elliott / Hannah Watson vs Marina Vigil Celorio / Lauren Gutterman0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGenevieve Tarlton / Alesandra Echeandia vs Elizabeth Crider / Marissa Valentine-King2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCrystal Fain / Donna Miller vs Sarah Pletcher / Cayleigh Simpson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#4 DoublesCindy Tiu / Megan Tan vs Jordan Fandry / Erica Nicholas6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Open Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Hannah Watson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.34
Crystal Fain
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.33
Cindy Tiu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.11
Thao Westenhaver
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.01
Kaye Williams
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.79
Kristin Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
3.79
Kimberly Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Alesandra Echeandia
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Genevieve Tarlton
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Kate Davis
published
Megan Tan
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Elliott + Crystal Fain10457% games+4.4% vs expected
Kimberly Elliott + Hannah Watson2344% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Tiu + Megan Tan314 matchesnot enough data
Genevieve Tarlton + Crystal Fain213 matchesnot enough data
Genevieve Tarlton + Kaye Williams303 matchesnot enough data
Kaye Williams + Thao Westenhaver123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hannah Watson
28W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.52
5
Crystal Fain
60W–30L career · 8 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.34
4.5
Cindy Tiu
40W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
4.33
Thao Westenhaver
38W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
4.11
Kaye Williams
33W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
4.01
Kristin Barnes
37W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Kimberly Elliott
176W–56L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
3.79
Alesandra Echeandia
4W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Genevieve Tarlton
27W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kate Davis
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Megan Tan
10W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.