Teams

Too Fit To Quit (Chi/Yang)

2026 STL Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Combined

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ST. LOUIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-23vs ElverhoyWon 21
W#1 DoublesAhn Lam / Wendy Yang vs Wesley Law / Cajal Sumino6-4, 4-4
W#2 DoublesJay Lyons / Grace Chi vs John Callahan / Cheryl Perlmutter6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesStephen Lewis / Kimberly Hammond vs David Carr / Rebecca Welton3-6, 0-6
2026-08-16vs ElverhoyLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Wedick / Ahn Lam vs David Carr / Wan-In Koo4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJim Enright / Liz Rice vs Stuart Friess / Cheryl Perlmutter2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesStephen Lewis / Rose Ehresman vs Rebecca Welton / Charles Welton4-6, 6-7
2026-08-16vs Hong Kong Phooey (Shouldis)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJoseph Potthoff / Ita Pumphrey vs Keith Allison / Elizabeth Spencer6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKevin Bayer / Kimberly Hammond vs Sam Shouldis / Lisa Campbell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJim Enright / Liz Rice vs Joseph Delsignore / Heidy Weicht3-6, 4-6
2026-08-09vs Hong Kong Phooey (Shouldis)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAhn Lam / Wendy Yang vs John Nash / Felice Rolnick7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJay Lyons / Ita Pumphrey vs Derek Stirewalt / Elizabeth Spencer4-6, 6-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoseph Potthoff / Rose Ehresman vs Sanjeev Kamat / Severine Huchet3-6, 4-6
2026-06-28vs ElverhoyLost 03
L#1 DoublesGrace Chi / Jay Lyons vs Mary Hartman / John Callahan6-4, 2-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWendy Yang / Joseph Potthoff vs Linda Lord-Schaaf / Stuart Friess3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Wedick / Bill Chen vs Wan-In Koo / Eric Elverhoy4-6, 3-6
2026-06-14vs Hong Kong Phooey (Shouldis)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAhn Lam / Wendy Yang vs Sam Shouldis / Florence Streeter6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Chi / Sarah Wedick vs Derek Stirewalt / Heidy Weicht5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Bayer / Kimberly Hammond vs Keith Allison / Patricia Fry2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Combined
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hong Kong Phooey (Shouldis)4110516144
2Elverhoy227512105
3Too Fit To Quit (Chi/Yang)03181698

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Kevin Bayer
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
4.01
Liz Rice
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.90
Grace Chi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Ahn Lam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Bill Chen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
David Chi
published 4
3.71
Ita Pumphrey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Jay Lyons
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Wendy Yang
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.63
Sarah Wedick
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Joseph Potthoff
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Rose Ehresman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Kimberly Hammond
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jim Enright
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Stephen Lewis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jay Lyons + Grace Chi5355% games−0.9% vs expected
Wendy Yang + Bill Chen2546% games−3.0% vs expected
Grace Chi + David Chi4845% games−7.7% vs expected
Joseph Potthoff + Kimberly Hammond4344% games−19.5% vs expected
Wendy Yang + Ahn Lam5261% gamesnot enough data
Liz Rice + Jim Enright2438% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Yang + Jim Enright123 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Potthoff + Rose Ehresman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Bayer
99W–83L career · 6 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
4.09
Liz Rice
120W–99L career · 5 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
4.01
Grace Chi
72W–79L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.90
4
Ahn Lam
6W–3L career · type M · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Bill Chen
43W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4
David Chi
10W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ita Pumphrey
62W–71L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Jay Lyons
119W–135L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
Wendy Yang
110W–89L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
Sarah Wedick
75W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.63
Joseph Potthoff
42W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Rose Ehresman
80W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Kimberly Hammond
51W–153L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.04
Jim Enright
49W–108L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephen Lewis
3W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.