Teams

Eagle Harbor - Jones

2022 Duval Adult 55 & Over - Women Winter · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Winter - Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-04-09vs Williams Y - CathcartWon 10
W#3 DoublesDeana Jones / Kimberly Schoof vs Jennifer Williams / Linda Carollo6-1, 6-3
2022-03-26vs Southside - ShumanLost 01
L#2 DoublesSherri Bair / Kimberly Schoof vs Sandy Wedge / Laura Yocum7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-02-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesKimberly Schoof / Mary Knox vs Siri Jansen / Linda Carollo6-3, 6-3
2022-01-15vs Huguenot - KelleyWon 10
W#2 DoublesKellie Philips / Kimberly Schoof vs Judith Daniel / Vandi Cole6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Winter - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Debbie Schmidt
published 3.5
3.29
Kandee Townsend
published
3.22
3.22
Nancy Wentz
published
3.22
3.22
Lori Aiosa
published
3.15
Jolene Hamel
published
2.92
Toni McCormack
published
2.91
Deana Jones
published 3
2.79
Stephanie Rouse
published
Julie Stofan
published
Kellie Philips
published
Kimberly Schoof
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Virginia Collins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jolene Hamel + Nancy Wentz4256% gamesnot enough data
Kandee Townsend + Lori Aiosa303 matchesnot enough data
Jolene Hamel + Cynthia Roland-Murray213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debbie Schmidt
12W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
Kandee Townsend
16W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Kristen Schermerhorn
16W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Nancy Wentz
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Cynthia Roland-Murray
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Lori Aiosa
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Jolene Hamel
15W–16L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Toni McCormack
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Deana Jones
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
Stephanie Rouse
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
Julie Stofan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kellie Philips
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberly Schoof
36W–35L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Virginia Collins
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.