Teams

MD.Griffin

2024 CTRL Mixed 18 & Over · Mixed 18 & Over 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-29vs TOC.DessoukyWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Baddour / Carey Baddour vs Moe Dessouky / Lindsay Castret6-4, 6-4
2024-07-24vs TOC.XuWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Baddour / Carey Baddour vs Button Hall / Istvan Pataki7-5, 6-3
2024-07-13vs TOC.YaoWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarey Baddour / David Baddour vs Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo / Brett Compton6-4, 6-3
2024-07-04vs TOC.XuWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Baddour / Carey Baddour vs Nikki DAmbrose / Kevin Moyung7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-06-08vs TOC.YaoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarey Baddour / David Baddour vs Karen Reynders / Brett Compton6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTerry Perrone / John Park vs Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo / Maxwell Gregson1-6, 1-6
2024-06-01vs TOC.DessoukyLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarey Baddour / David Baddour vs Lindsay Castret / Moe Dessouky6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2024-05-26vs MCSP.BarcinasWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Baddour / Carey Baddour vs Tim Cavanaugh / Connie Kim2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 18 & Over 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Christian Shelby
published 4.5
3.83
David Baddour
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.78
Collin Carter
published 4
3.77
Carolyn Lee
published 4
3.74
Sarah Shelby
published
3.65
Carey Baddour
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.56
Sandra Park
published
3.46
Terry Perrone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Lisa Griffin
published
3.23
Carol Cooke
published 3.5
3.20
Todd Bachman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carey Baddour + David Baddour272051% games+2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christian Shelby
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
4
David Baddour
124W–96L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.83
4
Collin Carter
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Carolyn Lee
26W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Sarah Shelby
49W–30L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Carey Baddour
237W–204L career · 7 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.65
Sandra Park
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Terry Perrone
403W–263L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
Lisa Griffin
21W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Carol Cooke
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Todd Bachman
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.