Teams

OP-Wilk/Ing Drop Shots (40s 7.5W)

2026 Neuse River Combo 40 & Over · 40s 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-15vs GR-Taylor (40s 7.5W)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMignon Ingram / Leone Gravelin vs Holly Medlin / Susan Johnson3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSandy Phillips / Lynn Easley vs Jill Davis / Whitney Musgrave6-1, 2-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Acosta / Ruby Williams vs Josie Ottaviani / Kelly Whitley2-6, 2-6
2026-08-08vs GCC-Pons/Carlson (40s 7.5W)Won 20
W#1 DoublesSherry Hambright / Sandy Phillips vs Catherine Land / Roberta Veluci-Marlow6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMignon Ingram / Tracy Wilkinson vs MI HWA LEE / Diane Pons6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40s 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Doris Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Sherry Hambright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Marsha Pierson
published
3.61
Mignon Ingram
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Denise Wells
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Lynn Easley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Sandy Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Cameron Fitzsimmons
published 3.5
3.31
Debra Johann
published 3.5
3.23
Lauren Acosta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Mariana Goldstein
published
3.15
Donna McNeill
published 3.5
Leone Gravelin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mignon Ingram + Sandy Phillips7173% games+11.8% vs expected
Sherry Hambright + Doris Smith12359% games+6.9% vs expected
Lynn Easley + Sandy Phillips9166% games+6.9% vs expected
Denise Wells + Doris Smith314 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Phillips + Mariana Goldstein404 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Acosta + Sandy Phillips123 matchesnot enough data
Donna McNeill + Sandy Phillips213 matchesnot enough data
Debra Johann + Mariana Goldstein213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Doris Smith
23W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
Sherry Hambright
15W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.78
Marsha Pierson
8W–4L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
Mignon Ingram
19W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Denise Wells
17W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
Lynn Easley
19W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Sandy Phillips
46W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Cameron Fitzsimmons
8W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Debra Johann
22W–14L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.31
Lauren Acosta
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Mariana Goldstein
30W–20L career · no lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Donna McNeill
7W–5L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
Leone Gravelin
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.