Teams

NSFW 5.0

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekEND · Men's 5.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.86 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-07-12vs Longhorn LobbersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCrisanto Ramirez / Jason Haugen vs Calum Robe / Brett Obrien6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesCHARLES MAYER vs Tom Ou4-6, 3-6
2026-06-28vs Southside Bangers 2 - 5.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAndreas Mueller-Immergluck / CHARLES MAYER vs Aidan DeLeon / Pierce Brandan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBenji Freeberg vs Ryan van de Water2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Pan / Crisanto Ramirez vs Evan T Andrews / Armaan Choudhary4-6, 3-6
2026-06-14vs Smash Bros 5.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesCHARLES MAYER / Jason Haugen vs Jeffrey Guevara / Vinicio Hadlich6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAndreas Mueller-Immergluck vs Davin Hanton5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-06-08vs Longhorn LobbersWon 21
W#1 DoublesCHARLES MAYER / Andreas Mueller-Immergluck vs Yu Senda / Joshua Minor7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCrisanto Ramirez vs Diego Robalino6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJason Haugen / Benji Freeberg vs Brett Obrien / Calum Robe3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-07vs A-team 5.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesConnor Sims / D'Artagnan Bebel vs Hiep Chung / Subu Jayaram6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCHARLES MAYER vs Carlos Alcantara6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesYan Krasny / Sharvil Nawghare vs Jaime Diaz Perez / Andrew Swanson6-2, 6-2
2026-05-31vs Southside Bangers 5.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCHARLES MAYER / Andreas Mueller-Immergluck vs Brett Powers / Estevam Strecker3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCrisanto Ramirez vs Chase Morehouse6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJason Haugen / Alex Babar vs Grant Chambers / Manuel Orta4-6, 1-6
2026-05-17vs Southside Bangers 2 - 5.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCrisanto Ramirez / Paul Pan vs Bruno Snyder / Cody Hall6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesConnor Sims vs Ryan van de Water3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesYan Krasny / CHARLES MAYER vs Hoanh Le / Angel Tavera2-6, 6-7
2026-05-03vs Smash Bros 5.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesLars Wiik / Sharvil Nawghare vs Davin Hanton / Lucas Bombonatti4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesCrisanto Ramirez vs Ryan Goldstein6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesConnor Sims / Paul Pan vs Vinicio Hadlich / Chris Bunker6-3, 6-2
2026-04-26vs A-team 5.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesSharvil Nawghare / Lars Wiik vs Carlos Alcantara / Andrew Swanson6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCHARLES MAYER vs Jaime Diaz Perez6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlex Babar / Paul Pan vs Herbert Nesloney / Hiep Chung6-2, 6-2
2026-04-19vs Southside Bangers 5.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesAndreas Mueller-Immergluck / Lars Wiik vs Grant Chambers / Manuel Orta7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSharvil Nawghare vs Thomas Collins1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesConnor Sims / CHARLES MAYER vs Estevam Strecker / Simon Boyce4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.63 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.85
CHARLES MAYER
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.85
Crisanto Ramirez
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.82
Paul Pan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.76
Jason Haugen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Alex Babar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
Benji Freeberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 5
4.67
Sharvil Nawghare
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.67
Andreas Mueller-Immergluck
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 5
4.52
D'Artagnan Bebel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.49
Lars Wiik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.46
Juan Dekruyff
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
4.46
Connor Sims
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.40
Yan Krasny
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andreas Mueller-Immergluck + CHARLES MAYER213 matchesnot enough data
Yan Krasny + Crisanto Ramirez213 matchesnot enough data
Jason Haugen + Crisanto Ramirez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
CHARLES MAYER
6W–3L career · type S · 9 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.85
5
Crisanto Ramirez
17W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.85
Paul Pan
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.82
Jason Haugen
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.76
5
Alex Babar
3W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
5
Benji Freeberg
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sharvil Nawghare
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.67
5
Andreas Mueller-Immergluck
7W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.67
4.5
D'Artagnan Bebel
16W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%45%55%
4.52
Lars Wiik
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
4.49
Juan Dekruyff
77W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
4.46
4.5
Connor Sims
40W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
4.46
Yan Krasny
6W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.