Teams

Sam / John

2022 DC MTL Adult 18 & Over Spring · DC MTL Adult 18 & Over 5.0 Men

16 players · average NTRP 5.00 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-22vs Laith / VivekSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLandon Schaefer / Fredrik Skoglund vs Michael Liu / Thibaut Perol7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJuan Borga vs Zac Castagna7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-05-15vs Laith / VivekWon 20
W#1 DoublesSamuel Cohen / Austin Longacre vs Alex Hur / Tomas Darsin4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Watts / Brandon Wozniczka vs Zachary Jones / Rohan Wadehra6-3, 6-3
2022-05-11vs Laith / VivekWon 20
W#1 DoublesPatrick Brick / Samuel Cohen vs Laith Layous / Steven Wenzel6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTodd Campbell / Austin Longacre vs Tomas Darsin / Zachary Jones6-2, 6-4
2022-04-30Split 11
W#1 DoublesTodd Campbell / Brandon Wozniczka vs Michael Liu / John Anderson5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPatrick Hughes vs Zac Castagna5-7
2022-04-24vs Laith / VivekWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Czerwinski / Andrew Harrington vs Tomas Darsin / Thibaut Perol6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAvery Schober vs Brian Randolph6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTodd Campbell / Steven Williams vs Zachary Jones / Michael Liu7-6, 7-6
2022-04-20vs Laith / VivekWon 21
W#1 DoublesPatrick Brick / Samuel Cohen vs Tomas Darsin / Brian Randolph7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesPatrick Hughes vs Zac Castagna6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTodd Campbell / Thomas Manning vs Vivek Hariharan / Michael Liu4-6, 3-6
2022-04-14vs Laith / VivekWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Mook / Matt Stillwagon vs Ronaldopaolo de Guzman / Rohan Wadehra6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesPatrick Hughes vs Michael Mironchenko6-2, 5-4
W#2 DoublesAustin Longacre / Steven Williams vs Tomas Darsin / Vivek Hariharan7-5, 6-1
2022-04-09vs Laith / VivekWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Mook / Matt Stillwagon vs Michael Liu / Steven Wenzel7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAvery Schober vs Michael Mironchenko6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChris Czerwinski / Steven Williams vs Laith Layous / Tomas Darsin6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · DC MTL Adult 18 & Over 5.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sam / John7119512174
2Laith / Vivek1751939259

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.50 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.92
Austin Longacre
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.87
Matt Stillwagon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Avery Schober
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
Chris Czerwinski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
Fredrik Skoglund
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.60
Samuel Cohen
published
4.56
Landon Schaefer
published
4.36
4.15
Sam Lieber
published
4.00
Patrick Brick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Andrew Harrington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Mook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Watts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Juan Borga
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Patrick Hughes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Todd Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Mook + Matt Stillwagon4154% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Brick + Matt Stillwagon303 matchesnot enough data
John Mook + Austin Longacre303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Austin Longacre
64W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
4.92
5
Matt Stillwagon
213W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
4.87
5
Avery Schober
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
5
Chris Czerwinski
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
5
Fredrik Skoglund
2W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Samuel Cohen
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
4.60
Landon Schaefer
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
4.56
5
Brandon Wozniczka
28W–19L career · no lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
4.36
Sam Lieber
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
Patrick Brick
16W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
4.00
Andrew Harrington
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
John Mook
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
John Watts
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Juan Borga
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Patrick Hughes
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Todd Campbell
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.