Teams

El.Hodges18S

2024 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 5.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-21vs Ne.Day18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesPaula Collado Cordon vs Ivette Duran6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-14vs Ne.Day18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesTanita Tedamrongwanish vs Nena Marks1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMaryBeth Jackson vs Ivette Duran6-4, 6-4
2024-06-30vs Ne.Day18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesMaryBeth Jackson vs Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade7-5, 6-2
W#3 SinglesTanita Tedamrongwanish vs Anne Lyford6-1, 6-3
2024-06-23vs Ne.Day18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesTanita Tedamrongwanish vs Jennifer Hiller3-6, 1-6
2024-06-16vs Ne.Day18SLost 02
L#2 SinglesMaryBeth Jackson vs Nena Marks2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesPaula Collado Cordon vs Jamie Breunig3-6, 0-6
2024-06-09vs Ne.Day18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesPaula Collado Cordon vs Jennifer Hiller0-6, 2-6
2024-06-02vs Ne.Day18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesTanita Tedamrongwanish vs Ivette Duran6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.85
Elizabeth Hodges
published 5
4.71
Laura Alvarez
published
4.70
Tanita Tedamrongwanish
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 5
4.62
Emily Perry
published 5
4.46
MaryBeth Jackson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.44
Paula Collado Cordon
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.42
Angelina Neiberger
published 4.5
Karen Rothschild
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MaryBeth Jackson + Tanita Tedamrongwanish4257% games+10.2% vs expected
MaryBeth Jackson + Elizabeth Hodges3261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Elizabeth Hodges
19W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
4.85
Laura Alvarez
15W–13L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
4.71
5
Tanita Tedamrongwanish
179W–94L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
4.70
5
Emily Perry
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
4.62
4.5
MaryBeth Jackson
108W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
4.46
5
Paula Collado Cordon
64W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
4.44
4.5
Angelina Neiberger
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
4.42
Karen Rothschild
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.