Teams

Krusers

2025 Corpus Christi 18 & Over USTA League · Mens 3.0 Flight

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-12vs PortlandLost 13
L#1 DoublesSteve Jennings / Jeffrey Pruitt vs Stormy Watts / Parker Brown1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesHenry Fulton vs Joe Muehlbauer6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLee George / Michael Moore vs David Bartels / Robert Heller4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSteven Schindler / Richard Avalos vs Paul Pustejovsky / Chris Flemming2-6, 3-6
2025-04-21vs Tennis QuaidWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteven Cole / Andrew Boucher vs Daniel Carlisle / Payne Neessen6-2, 6-2
2025-04-07vs PortlandLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteven Cole / Andrew Boucher vs Jesse Ibarra / Joe Muehlbauer3-6, 0-6
2025-03-31vs Fence HittersWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteven Cole / Jeffrey Pruitt vs Joe Puente / Roy Gonzalez6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mens 3.0 Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Jeffrey Pruitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Steven Cole
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Andrew Boucher
published 3
2.58
Lee George
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Russell Borth
published
2.52
Steve Jennings
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Richard Avalos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Steven Schindler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Dominic Gonzalez
published
Henry Fulton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Avalos + Steven Schindler0823% games−14.7% vs expected
Steven Cole + Russell Borth0532% gamesnot enough data
Steve Jennings + Steven Schindler044 matchesnot enough data
Steve Jennings + Russell Borth123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Pruitt
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Steven Cole
76W–63L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Andrew Boucher
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Lee George
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
28%71%<1%
2.58
Russell Borth
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
2.58
Steve Jennings
3W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Richard Avalos
3W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Steven Schindler
1W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.25
Dominic Gonzalez
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Henry Fulton
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.