Teams

SD 4.0 Tierrasanta TC (3:2)/ Annobil

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE · SD - Men - 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-08Lost 01
L#2 SinglesGeorge Annobil vs Victor Zayas2-6, 4-6
2025-05-29vs SD 4.0 SDTRC (3:2)/ ChannickLost 01
L#1 DoublesGeorge Annobil / Ron Weber vs Ryan Adams / Marc Channick1-6, 0-6
2025-05-18vs SD LLW 4.0 Balboa TC/ MalleryLost 01
L#2 SinglesGeorge Annobil vs Kevin Mallery6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCale Carson vs Serge Glaeser3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Pusod / Erwin Pagtaconan vs Scott Calhoun / Edward Grader1-6, 4-6
2025-05-04vs SD 4.0 LJTC (3:2)/ WattonWon 10
W#3 DoublesGeorge Annobil / Christopher Penn vs Everett Roach / Robert Leibowitz6-1, 6-4
L#1 DoublesGeorge Annobil / Andrew Nguyen vs PIERRE CHATELAIN / Pete Saucedo0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-13vs SD 4.0 PBTC (2@11AM: 3)/ MaurizLost 01
L#1 SinglesGeorge Annobil vs Camron Chermak0-6, 3-6
2025-04-06vs SD 4.0 Peninsula TC (TBD)/ HaireLost 01
L#3 DoublesGeorge Annobil / Christopher Penn vs James McCahill / Joel Corrales3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
3.75
Ron Weber
published
Daniel Pusod
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Eric Traboulay
published 4
3.70
Trung Vu
published
3.64
Cale Carson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.63
Shahria Hossain
published
3.61
Christopher Penn
published 4
3.52
3.49
George Annobil
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.47
Craig Lauer
published 4
3.41
Justin Cook
published
2.99
Erwin Pagtaconan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Mehran Ghaemi
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Francois Loubaresse
28W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
Ron Weber
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Daniel Pusod
0W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Eric Traboulay
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Trung Vu
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Cale Carson
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.64
Shahria Hossain
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Christopher Penn
3W–15L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Christopher Fontilea
18W–16L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
George Annobil
79W–107L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
4
Craig Lauer
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.47
Justin Cook
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
3
Erwin Pagtaconan
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Mehran Ghaemi
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.