Teams

MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 40MX6.0B

2024 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX6.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Joma Ann Raniel
published
3.60
Bonnie Chamchawee
published 3.5
3.48
Octavio Farfan
published
3.39
Frederick Raniel
published 3.5
3.38
Viet Trinh
published
3.28
Anton Andreev
published 3.5
3.22
Mimi Fichter
published
3.18
Tommy Lin
published
3.12
Mona Lee
published
3.00
Ann Kerdchonphet
published 3
2.97
Matthew Derby
published
2.95
Russ Lujan
published
2.95
Melanie Cazenas
published
2.86
Tomomi Albert
published
2.84
Xiaoyun Han
published
2.81
Al Chiang
published 3
Dennis Pereyra
published 3
2.72
J Chiu
published 3
2.27
Ignacio Quiroz
published 2.5
2.15
Marina Khitrov
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tomomi Albert + Anton Andreev1535% games−5.1% vs expected
Bonnie Chamchawee + Ignacio Quiroz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joma Ann Raniel
30W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.92
3.5
Bonnie Chamchawee
82W–30L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.60
Octavio Farfan
19W–18L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Frederick Raniel
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.39
Viet Trinh
21W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Anton Andreev
31W–31L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.28
Mimi Fichter
36W–18L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
Tommy Lin
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
Mona Lee
29W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.12
3
Ann Kerdchonphet
35W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.00
Matthew Derby
15W–14L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.97
Russ Lujan
6W–16L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.95
Melanie Cazenas
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
Tomomi Albert
6W–20L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
2.86
Xiaoyun Han
11W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Al Chiang
10W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2024
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Dennis Pereyra
1W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
J Chiu
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
2.72
2.5
Ignacio Quiroz
6W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.27
Marina Khitrov
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.