Teams

Schmidt/Plowman

2022 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Julia Plowman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Wendy Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Megan Ullmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results7 ties
2022-08-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMegan Ullmann / Leslie Sampson vs Sarie Crothers / Kathy Cooke6-3, 6-1
2022-08-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesWendy Schmidt / Megan Ullmann vs Amy Hicks / Molly Wilson6-0, 6-4
2022-08-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesWendy Schmidt / Megan Ullmann vs Wendi Ouellette / Jane Paulsen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJulia Plowman / Wendy Schmidt vs Meegan Fruits / Jean Zuber Marshburn6-4, 6-3
2022-07-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Johnson / Julia Plowman vs Shannon Davis / Joanna Asia Wagner6-4, 6-2
2022-07-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesJulia Plowman / Wendy Schmidt vs Dianna Kaady / Trinity Treat6-2, 6-1
2022-07-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesJulia Plowman / Jennifer Johnson vs Phyllis Ghazi / Kathryn Pearson6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Julia Plowman
73W–28L career
6%94%1%
3.20
3.5
Wendy Schmidt
41W–32L career
26%74%0%
3.06
3
Megan Ullmann
20W–15L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.