Teams

Martin

2022 Anne Arundel Mixed 55 & Over · Anne Arundel Mixed 55 & Over 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.44 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-06Won 10
W#3 DoublesGregory Saunders / Melissa Albers vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-24vs Double TroubleLost 01
L#2 DoublesGary Gladden / Mary Corbiere vs Wayne Powell / Kaye Witting2-6, 3-6
2022-08-14vs Double TroubleSplit 11
L#2 DoublesGregory Saunders / Claire Rossmark vs Denise Martin Barnes / Albert Hardeman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMasako Murphy / Anthony Cossentino vs Ray Walls / Jackie Livesay2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-28vs JacobsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnthony Cossentino / Melissa Albers vs Greg Burch / SanYvette Williams6-2, 6-4
2022-07-17vs JacobsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesMasako Murphy / Anthony Cossentino vs June Means / Mike Spivey3-6, 6-7
2022-07-14vs Double TroubleWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Herrera / Claire Rossmark vs Michael Witting / Cyndi Casey6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael McGowan / Melissa Albers vs Ray Walls / Claris Brock6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-07vs JacobsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesMelissa Albers / Gregory Saunders vs Marie Sokoloff / Mike Spivey0-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Mixed 55 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Helen Patterson
published 4
3.49
Michael McGowan
published
3.34
Holly Hill
published 3.5
3.27
Mesanie Lee
published
Gregory Saunders
published 3.5
3.25
Claire Rossmark
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Masako Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Melissa Albers
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Greg Richardson
published 3
2.63
Mary Corbiere
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Joe Langlois
published
Steven Hill
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Helen Patterson
10W–14L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.70
Michael McGowan
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Holly Hill
10W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
Mesanie Lee
26W–27L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Gregory Saunders
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Claire Rossmark
147W–165L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Masako Murphy
132W–138L career · 2 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Melissa Albers
86W–110L career · 4 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Greg Richardson
0W–5L career · type M · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Mary Corbiere
67W–149L career · 1 line in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
Joe Langlois
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Hill
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.