Teams

MV:Moran:Moran

2022 Cape Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.5 Women Flt 1

8 players · average NTRP / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-09vs MV:Sonneborn:SonnebornWon 31
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Furst / Carlene Gatting vs Lindsey Scott / Moira Silva6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAmy Keith vs Margaret Bodnar6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMaya Moran / Lisa Wargo vs Liz McCartney / Skye Sonneborn4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBeth Kostman / Nadia Alberghini vs Amy Custer / Anne Williamson7-6, 6-4
2022-07-02vs MV:Sonneborn:SonnebornSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Keith / Maya Moran vs Amy Custer / Anne Williamson6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Furst / Lisa Wargo vs Moira Silva / Skye Sonneborn5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-25vs MV:Sonneborn:SonnebornWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Reagan / Amy Keith vs Anne Williamson / Amy Custer6-2, 6-2
2022-06-19vs MV:Sonneborn:SonnebornWon 10
W#1 SinglesLisa Reagan vs Margaret Bodnar7-6, 6-2
2022-06-11vs MV:Sonneborn:SonnebornWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Reagan / Carlene Gatting vs Margaret Bodnar / Joni Jackman6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Women Flt 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MV:Moran:Moran5014613143
2MV:Sonneborn:Sonneborn0561431212

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.70
Lisa Wargo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Keith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Beth Kostman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Carlene Gatting
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Reagan
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Maya Moran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nadia Alberghini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Suzanne Furst
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Wargo
8W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Amy Keith
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Beth Kostman
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Carlene Gatting
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Reagan
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maya Moran
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nadia Alberghini
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Suzanne Furst
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.