Teams

Ka.Conley40A

2025 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-05vs Er.Conigliaro40ALost 01
L#3 DoublesDeb Lanier / Kellie Chesson vs Manjula Nagaraja / Liz Arcos5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-05-02vs Am.Williams40ALost 12
L#1 SinglesCelia Whited vs Kate Cannon2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDeb Lanier / Beth Johnson vs Rachel Matthews / McKenzie Keenan Osman2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Bell / Kellie Chesson vs Allison Sheehan / Rebecca Bennett6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-04-28vs Al.Crumpler40ALost 01
L#1 SinglesChristy Team vs Ginny Meier6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-21vs Be.Beam40ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Conley / Christy Team vs Kathryn Beth Beam / Monica Collins3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDeb Lanier / Sarah Bell vs Tara Spina / Leslie Wright6-4, 6-3
2025-03-24vs Ro.Bonello40ALost 01
L#1 SinglesCelia Whited vs Kathleen Cannon0-6, 0-6
2025-03-03vs Ly.Manweiler40AWon 20
W#1 SinglesChristy Team vs Sarah Mulligan6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Cronin / Celia Whited vs Lynne Manweiler / Jennifer London4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Julie Cronin
published
3.63
Jean Harrold
published
3.59
Deb Lanier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.55
Karen Conley
published
3.49
Kristin Rice
published
3.42
Christy Team
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.33
Beth Rives
published 3.5
Celia Whited
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.15
Cara Kuremsky
published 3.5
3.08
Kellie Chesson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
Holli Swenson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christy Team + Kellie Chesson422159% games+6.9% vs expected
Celia Whited + Kellie Chesson7356% gamesnot enough data
Deb Lanier + Celia Whited4258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Cronin
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Jean Harrold
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Deb Lanier
487W–223L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.59
Karen Conley
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Kristin Rice
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
4
Christy Team
150W–90L career · 3 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Beth Rives
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Celia Whited
79W–80L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Cara Kuremsky
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Kellie Chesson
107W–119L career · 9 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Holli Swenson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.