Teams

SO KULIG/OSBORNE

2026 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-17vs BIR FERRELLWon 20
W#1 DoublesLauren Dacierno / Inglan Poland vs Preeti Rangee / Patty Hart6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCallie Jennings vs Stacey Noland6-2, 6-1
2026-04-10vs WAG ALEXANDERLost 23
L#1 DoublesLacie Eubanks / Laura Martin vs Casey Colvin / Kathleen Cason6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLeah Loose vs Paula Alexander2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Team / Kelly Dakan vs Jennifer Herrmann / Becky Humphrey6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesCallie Jennings vs Michala Christianson4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Dacierno / Inglan Poland vs Jessica Brugler / Rebecca Yates6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-03vs ATC GRANBY/SMITHWon 40
W#1 DoublesLauren Dacierno / Lacie Eubanks vs Diana Galyen / Janis Deane6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMelissa Kulig / Katie Osborne vs Tiffany Smith / Joy Blaha6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCallie Jennings vs Jo Anne Golaz6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLaura Martin / Tina Springer vs Geraldine Stjohn / LINDA FEATHERSTONE6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2026-03-27vs RC MOOREWon 31
L#1 DoublesLacie Eubanks / Melissa Kulig vs Lina Taylor / Virginia Fain6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlison Bagdy vs Veronica Dummit6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLauren Dacierno / Inglan Poland vs Chandler Hallum / Ashli East6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKim Hood / Kelly Dakan vs Catherine Davis / Ellie Martin6-2, 6-2
2026-03-13vs CCC GRENNANLost 12
L#1 DoublesTina Springer / Jennifer West vs Sharon Fulgham / Katie Coultress6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAlison Bagdy vs Anna Pastusek6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Martin / Inglan Poland vs Merrell Banks / Katie Bruhn7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-06vs STC OWENSWon 32
W#1 DoublesKim Hood / Lacie Eubanks vs Mayra di Cristina / Helen Herron1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlison Bagdy vs Cara O'Leary6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLauren Dacierno / Laura Martin vs Judy Hulsey / Christi Handy6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesLeah Loose vs Season Renegar2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Team / Inglan Poland vs Petra Heagy / Katherine Conrad2-6, 4-6
2026-02-27vs RID BONNELLLost 23
L#1 DoublesInglan Poland / Kim Hood vs MEREDITH CODY / Melinda Delk0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKatie Osborne vs Lauren Selking7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeigh Brown / Melissa Kulig vs Chelsea Davis / Merry Milliken1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLacie Eubanks vs Natalie Moore7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAbby Reardon / Jennifer West vs Ivy Ellis / Stacy Hollis1-6, 2-6
2026-02-20vs CCC MCDONALDWon 40
W#1 DoublesLacie Eubanks / Melissa Kulig vs Whitney Rudner / Elizabeth Warren6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLauren Dacierno / Leah Loose vs Chelsea Allen / Katie Mcdonald6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKatie Osborne vs Lynnette Kile6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLizzie Voigt / Lauren Team vs Tracy Cannell / Julie Rhodes6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Alison Bagdy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.98
Katie Osborne
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.92
Melissa Kulig
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Lacie Eubanks
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Singles 13% · published
Abby Reardon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Inglan Poland
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Lauren Dacierno
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Leah Loose
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.54
Tina Springer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.46
Callie Jennings
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.38
Lauren Team
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.33
Kelly Dakan
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.29
Lizzie Voigt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Inglan Poland + Lauren Dacierno314 matchesnot enough data
Katie Osborne + Melissa Kulig224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alison Bagdy
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Katie Osborne
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
Melissa Kulig
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Lacie Eubanks
7W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Abby Reardon
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Inglan Poland
6W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Lauren Dacierno
7W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Leah Loose
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.62
Tina Springer
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
2.5
Callie Jennings
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%62%38%
2.46
Lauren Team
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
Kelly Dakan
4W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Lizzie Voigt
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.