Teams

Veltri/Goldstein

2025 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Night · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-23vs Lhp/PollittWon 10
W#3 DoublesAlexey Rasskazov / John Zamojcin vs Victor Schaefer / Domingos Carlos3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-09vs Midtown/HomesLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlexey Rasskazov / John Zamojcin vs PEDRO HOMES / Mariano Bosaz2-6, 1-6
2025-04-28vs Lhp/PollittWon 10
W#2 SinglesAlexey Rasskazov vs Sanjeev Sanghera6-4, 7-6
2025-04-21vs Broward/Sanabia/18&Over3.0MLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlexey Rasskazov / Alvaro Romero vs Alejandro Jose Hernandez / Jerry Wong2-6, 2-6
2025-04-14vs HeronBay/BanhamWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlexey Rasskazov / Juan Godoy vs Neil Bass / David Zlochower6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Alexey Rasskazov
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.00
Theodore Brill
published
2.98
Vincent Zarrella
published
2.91
Juan Godoy
published
2.88
Jason Connor
published
2.86
Edward Ng
published 3
2.83
John Zamojcin
published
2.82
Steven Rapp
published
2.80
Joe Goldstein
published
2.74
John Xanthos
published
2.71
Mike Mandell
published
2.64
Dennis Oringer
published 3
2.60
Bruce MacEwen
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juan Godoy + Edward Ng6358% games+3.9% vs expected
Mike Mandell + Edward Ng303 matchesnot enough data
Mike Mandell + John Zamojcin123 matchesnot enough data
Vincent Zarrella + Theodore Brill213 matchesnot enough data
Vincent Zarrella + John Zamojcin213 matchesnot enough data
Theodore Brill + Edward Ng213 matchesnot enough data
Theodore Brill + John Zamojcin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexey Rasskazov
122W–99L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.09
Theodore Brill
27W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Vincent Zarrella
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Juan Godoy
16W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
Jason Connor
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Edward Ng
30W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
2.86
John Zamojcin
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Steven Rapp
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Joe Goldstein
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
John Xanthos
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
Mike Mandell
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Dennis Oringer
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Bruce MacEwen
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.