Teams

O'Roark, Steven

2024 Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 5.0 - Weekend · 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-02-10vs HOA/Bicknell/40&Over3.5MLost 04
L#1 DoublesDel Wright / David Keefer vs David Marks / Brian Dennis2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMike Holm vs Bek Abdullayev0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSteven O'Roark / Brian Casebeer vs Jeff Nelson / Eric Wimmer2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRickey Baruth / Carl Moeller vs Mike Klender / John Nestor6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-02-04vs Zingg, BryanLost 13
L#1 DoublesSal Strano / Gary Mower vs Bryan Zingg / Josh Klingler2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDavid Keefer vs Nate Anderson6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Swanson / Steven O'Roark vs Robert Halksworth / Randy Burgess2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTom Fangman / Mike Holm vs Andrew Plungkhen / Jeff Myers1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brian Casebeer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Brian O'Neal
published 3.5
David Keefer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Carl Moeller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Mike Holm
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Rickey Baruth
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Del Wright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Gary Mower
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Geoffrey Lundy
published
Sal Strano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Steven O'Roark
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tom Fangman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Holm + Tom Fangman123 matchesnot enough data
Mike Holm + Geoffrey Lundy213 matchesnot enough data
Mike Holm + Steven O'Roark123 matchesnot enough data
Steven O'Roark + Sal Strano033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brian Casebeer
12W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Brian O'Neal
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
David Keefer
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Carl Moeller
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Mike Holm
20W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Rickey Baruth
9W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.99
3.5
Del Wright
1W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
90%10%<1%
2.82
Gary Mower
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Geoffrey Lundy
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sal Strano
12W–22L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Steven O'Roark
16W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tom Fangman
2W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.