Teams

N OR-SHC-Monson

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.05 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Paul Heath
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Jon Monson
published 4.5
3.94
Marcus Kroloff
published 4
3.79
Patrick Trank
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Chris Eddy
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Jason Crawford
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.70
Sam Bradshaw
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Matthew Trank
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Pete Stirling
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Russ DeMoss
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results11 ties
2023-08-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Heath / Jon Monson vs Brian Porter / Rocky Gutierrez6-0, 6-4
2023-08-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Heath / William Anderson vs Pete Addison / Randy Litch6-1, 6-2
2023-07-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesJon Monson / Paul Heath vs David Pham / Patrick Maginnis6-3, 6-1
2023-06-18Won 20
W#1 DoublesMatthew Trank / Patrick Trank vs Young Vo / Alan Jones6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam Anderson / Pete Stirling vs Steve Sun / Wahyu Setyawan4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-11Won 30
W#1 DoublesJon Monson / Chris Eddy vs Frank Olson / Tony Khamsouk6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSam Bradshaw vs Sheng Saechao7-5, 2-4
W#2 DoublesJason Crawford / Hector M Salomon vs Cristian Crisan / David Richardson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChris Eddy / William Anderson vs Rich Rice / Xiaonan Tian2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-20Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJason Crawford / Michael Chang vs Brian Hendrickson / Alex Simpson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSam Bradshaw vs Rohit Colaco6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJon Monson / Russ DeMoss vs Damon Ogden / Soren Coughlin-Glaser6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-05-12Won 20
W#2 DoublesMark Stephenson / Chris Eddy vs Vimal Natarajan / Saril Valiyaparambil6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRuss DeMoss / Jason Crawford vs Mitchell Whitehurst / Eric Means6-1, 6-3
2023-05-07Won 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Heath / Jon Monson vs Reza Kafi / Scott Lenker6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMatthew Trank / Patrick Trank vs Christian Casebeer / Brian Jones6-3, 6-2
2023-04-23Won 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Heath / Chris Eddy vs Neil Soiffer / NANDA SIDDAIAH6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPete Stirling / Jason Crawford vs TRIET NGUYEN / Quang Nguyen6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNoah Trubo / Sam Bradshaw vs Vu Tran / Henry Vu6-4, 6-2
2023-04-14Won 20
W#2 DoublesJon Monson / Russ DeMoss vs Michael Lee / Shane Kim3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChris Eddy / William Anderson vs Rick Collins / Ernie Levenson6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Paul Heath
7W–2L career
not enough data
4.5
Jon Monson
112W–41L career
2%98%0%
4.13
4
Marcus Kroloff
33W–11L career
0%86%14%
3.94
4
Patrick Trank
87W–59L career
1%98%1%
3.79
4
Chris Eddy
63W–53L career
6%91%4%
3.75
4
Jason Crawford
33W–25L career
not enough data
4
Sam Bradshaw
30W–19L career
4%96%0%
3.70
4
Matthew Trank
78W–63L career
3%97%0%
3.68
4
Pete Stirling
23W–16L career
7%93%0%
3.66
3.5
Russ DeMoss
84W–42L career · type A
0%97%3%
3.38

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.