Teams

Mumu Slams

2024 Adult 55 and Over League · 9.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.33 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-05vs Hawaii/Hinkley/55&Over9.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesMolly Lammers / Linda Landau vs Miranda Kolbe / Stacey Panui6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJunko Kadomatsu / Miyuki Haught vs Lori Tashima / Luanne Apo7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKathleen Lum / Jauchia Blythe vs Jeanette Bean / Loreen Hirano3-6, 3-6
2024-04-28vs Hawaii/Hinkley/55&Over9.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesMiyuki Haught / Earline Racoma vs Miranda Kolbe / Loreen Hirano2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMolly Lammers / Kathleen Lum vs Peggy Watanabe / Stacey Panui1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNoriko Tamamoto / Junko Kadomatsu vs Anna Hinkley / Yukie O Brewer3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-04-27vs Hawaii/Hinkley/55&Over9.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesJauchia Blythe / Linda Landau vs Miranda Kolbe / Yukie O Brewer2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Lum / Mary Firek vs Anna Hinkley / Lori Tashima3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMolly Lammers / Andrea Weathers vs Carolyn Thibault / Janice Draper3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-21vs Hawaii/Hinkley/55&Over9.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Firek / Noriko Tamamoto vs Lori Tashima / Peggy Watanabe1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMolly Lammers / Andrea Weathers vs Darlynn Barte / Jeanette Bean4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEarline Racoma / Andrea Yamato vs Loreen Hirano / Carolyn Thibault3-6, 3-6
2024-04-07vs Hawaii/Hinkley/55&Over9.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesJunko Kadomatsu / Miyuki Haught vs Jeanette Bean / Luanne Apo6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJauchia Blythe / Molly Lammers vs Darlynn Barte / Janice Draper1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEarline Racoma / Linda Landau vs Peggy Watanabe / Loreen Hirano5-7, 1-6
2024-03-24vs Hawaii/Hinkley/55&Over9.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Landau / Jauchia Blythe vs Janice Draper / Miranda Kolbe3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Yamato / Miyuki Haught vs Stacey Panui / Yukie O Brewer5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNoriko Tamamoto / Kathleen Lum vs Anna Hinkley / Lori Tashima0-6, 2-6
2024-03-17vs Hawaii/Hinkley/55&Over9.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesJunko Kadomatsu / Miyuki Haught vs Carolyn Thibault / Jeanette Bean6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJauchia Blythe / Linda Landau vs Peggy Watanabe / Darlynn Barte1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathleen Lum / Andrea Weathers vs Loreen Hirano / Luanne Apo6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hawaii/Hinkley/55&Over9.0W5213817159
2Mumu Slams2581330222

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Junko Kadomatsu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.18
Miyuki Haught
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
4.09
Molly Lammers
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Jauchia Blythe
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.04
Andrea Yamato
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.99
Earline Racoma
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.98
Andrea Weathers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.95
Linda Landau
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
3.76
Kathleen Lum
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Noriko Tamamoto
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
Mary Firek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Firek + Kathleen Lum3450% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Lum + Jauchia Blythe0534% gamesnot enough data
Noriko Tamamoto + Kathleen Lum134 matchesnot enough data
Earline Racoma + Jauchia Blythe213 matchesnot enough data
Miyuki Haught + Junko Kadomatsu303 matchesnot enough data
Linda Landau + Jauchia Blythe033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Junko Kadomatsu
99W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Miyuki Haught
112W–79L career · 11 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Molly Lammers
81W–82L career · 9 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
4.09
4.5
Jauchia Blythe
43W–56L career · 5 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.09
4.5
Andrea Yamato
60W–67L career · 2 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.04
4.5
Earline Racoma
45W–66L career · 7 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.99
4
Andrea Weathers
59W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%55%44%
3.98
Linda Landau
101W–91L career · 11 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
3.95
4
Kathleen Lum
34W–60L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Noriko Tamamoto
90W–59L career · 7 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Mary Firek
21W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.