Teams

NNM 2.5W Tanoan - White

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over League - NNM · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-04-18vs NNM 2.5W HP- MendenhallLost 12
L#1 DoublesFelicia White / Jodi Loftis vs Ruth Chow / Sonja Rodenz6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRachel Mosher vs Andrea Westman4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Kelly-Smith / Erika Anderson vs Jane Ferrizz / Heidi Effmann7-5, 6-0
2023-04-15vs NNM 2.5W Lobo - MorckLost 12
W#1 DoublesFelicia White / Julie Hirshfield vs Patricia Suslowicz / Danielle Kuna6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJulie Kelly-Smith vs Donna Harnick1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaila Raby / Lori Ryan vs Jennie Weese / Luz Gonzales2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-04-08vs NNM/Young/18 & Over/2.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesRachel Mosher / Jodi Loftis vs Samantha Marcus / Monica Young0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLori Ryan vs Laura Baiamonte0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesFelicia White / Julie Hirshfield vs Sabrina Leyba / Rebecca Pino6-1, 6-1
2023-04-01vs NNM 2.5W HP- MendenhallLost 03
L#1 DoublesMegan Fleming / Julie Kelly-Smith vs Andrea Westman / Marifer Martinez-Lujan2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJodi Loftis vs CARLA Donahue4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Hirshfield / Kaila Raby vs Junting Liu-Norrod / Julie DeWent4-6, 2-6
2023-03-25vs NNM 2.5W Lobo - MorckLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Hirshfield / Erika Anderson vs Donna Harnick / Gina Grier2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesRachel Mosher vs Francine Morris6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMegan Fleming / Kaila Raby vs Cecilia Sandoval / Jasmin Maestas2-6, 2-6
2023-03-18vs NNM/Young/18 & Over/2.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesFelicia White / Rachel Mosher vs Monica Young / Laura Baiamonte4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLori Ryan vs Stephanie Sisson7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMegan Fleming / Julie Kelly-Smith vs Kendall Harris / Samantha Marcus6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2023-03-11vs NNM 2.5W HP- MendenhallWon 21
W#1 DoublesMegan Fleming / Jodi Loftis vs Ruth Chow / Sonja Rodenz6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJulie Kelly-Smith vs Andrea Westman0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLori Ryan / Kaila Raby vs Jennifer Ludington / Melanie Upshaw6-0, 6-4
2023-03-04vs NNM 2.5W Lobo - MorckWon 30
W#1 DoublesJodi Loftis / Julie Hirshfield vs Cecilia Sandoval / Patricia Suslowicz7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMegan Fleming vs Jasmin Maestas6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Kelly-Smith / Lori Ryan vs Luz Gonzales / Jennie Weese6-2, 6-4
2023-02-25vs NNM/Young/18 & Over/2.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRachel Mosher / Jodi Loftis vs Laura Baiamonte / Brandy Ansotigue6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKaila Raby / Megan Fleming vs Melanie Hager / Katlin Mick2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM/Young/18 & Over/2.5W63171025217
2NNM 2.5W HP- Mendenhall54161126221
3NNM 2.5W Lobo - Morck54101737245
4NNM 2.5W Tanoan - White27111634250

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Rachel Mosher
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.39
Julie Kelly-Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.25
Felicia White
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.25
Megan Fleming
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.20
Julie Hirshfield
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Jodi Loftis
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kaila Raby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lori Ryan
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Felicia White + Julie Hirshfield5259% games+11.4% vs expected
Felicia White + Rachel Mosher5254% games+4.6% vs expected
Julie Kelly-Smith + Megan Fleming2347% gamesnot enough data
Julie Hirshfield + Megan Fleming0537% gamesnot enough data
Lori Ryan + Kaila Raby314 matchesnot enough data
Julie Kelly-Smith + Julie Hirshfield314 matchesnot enough data
Julie Hirshfield + Rachel Mosher314 matchesnot enough data
Julie Hirshfield + Kaila Raby314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Mosher
88W–42L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.87
Julie Kelly-Smith
22W–33L career · 6 lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.39
2.5
Felicia White
37W–64L career · 7 lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.25
Megan Fleming
22W–25L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.25
Julie Hirshfield
30W–19L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.20
Jodi Loftis
14W–7L career · 12 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kaila Raby
15W–22L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Ryan
28W–49L career · 11 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.