Teams

SILVA/40/6.5/CM/CAPS

2026 NO Southern Combo 40 & Over - Men · 6.5 NO (40&O) Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-09-02vs Broussard/40/6.5/CM/NOLTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesPeter Knecht / Mike Caparotta vs Ian Smith / Stephen Kearny3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNino Bonura / Steve Rauch vs Christopher Broussard / Bradley Knapp3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWilliam Boutte / Gerald Audler vs Tom Daly / Jesse Hoppes7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-26vs Orkus/40/6.5/CM/PRCLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Boutte / Peter Knecht vs Eric Perdomo / Bill Pappas4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCarl Silva / Gerald Audler vs John Bradford / Seth Fox6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMohammad Cheema / Mike Caparotta vs Joshua Thomas / Kenny Aubert4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 6.5 NO (40&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hagstette/40/6.5/CM/CP000000
2Broussard/40/6.5/CM/NOLTC000000
3Orkus/40/6.5/CM/PRC000000
4SILVA/40/6.5/CM/CAPS000000
5Staines/40/6.5/CM/LS000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Carl Silva
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
David Callaway
published 3.5
2.90
Peter Knecht
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Mohammad Cheema
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Gerald Audler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Nino Bonura
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Mike Caparotta
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.13
HERMAN SCHROEDER
published 2.5
William Boutte
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Knecht + Carl Silva3254% gamesnot enough data
Gerald Audler + Carl Silva213 matchesnot enough data
Peter Knecht + Nino Bonura213 matchesnot enough data
Peter Knecht + Mike Caparotta213 matchesnot enough data
Mike Caparotta + Mohammad Cheema213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carl Silva
31W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
3.5
David Callaway
12W–22L career · no lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.95
Peter Knecht
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.90
Mohammad Cheema
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Gerald Audler
5W–10L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Nino Bonura
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%2%
2.72
Mike Caparotta
15W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66
2.5
HERMAN SCHROEDER
1W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
William Boutte
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.