Teams

Stacey's team

2025 B · CS Adult 18 & Over League

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-06Lost 01
L#2 DoublesUrsula Winzer-Serhan / Andrea Cervantes vs Natalie Kidd / Lori Brown3-6, 2-6
2025-10-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesUrsula Winzer-Serhan / Heather Novicke vs Donna Miller / Natalie Kidd7-5, 6-4
2025-10-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesUrsula Winzer-Serhan / Heather Novicke vs Kerri Cawley / Lori Brown4-6, 2-6
2025-09-25vs Mary's TeamLost 02
L#2 DoublesStacey Stuhrenberg / Ursula Winzer-Serhan vs Donna Miller / Kerri Cawley2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Cervantes / Heather Novicke vs Natalie Kidd / Penny Cies2-6, 1-6
2025-09-18Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKristina Walters / Ursula Winzer-Serhan vs Donna Miller / Natalie Kidd1-6, 4-6
2025-09-11Lost 02
L#1 DoublesChelsie Breaux / Ursula Winzer-Serhan vs Lori Brown / Mary Harrison5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAndrea Cervantes / Heather Novicke vs Donna Miller / Natalie Kidd1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CS Adult 18 & Over League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chelsie Breaux
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
Estela Felan
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Heather Novicke
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
Andrea Cervantes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Candy Lischka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Kristina Walters
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Stacey Stuhrenberg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ursula Winzer-Serhan
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristina Walters + Chelsie Breaux314 matchesnot enough data
Heather Novicke + Candy Lischka123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chelsie Breaux
13W–8L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Estela Felan
9W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Heather Novicke
5W–6L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Andrea Cervantes
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Candy Lischka
3W–7L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristina Walters
7W–12L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacey Stuhrenberg
2W–20L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ursula Winzer-Serhan
7W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.