Teams

HCC - F. Aldeen

2023 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-17vs HIlls/D. Agnew/40&Over4.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesUri Covarrubias / Tish Wissel vs Michele Ironsmith / Joan Simmons0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesMary Turnes / Elaine Aschenbrenner vs Sonia Patrick / Debra Stump2-6, 2-6
2023-05-20vs HIlls/D. Agnew/40&Over4.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesFaith Sincich / Tish Wissel vs Lisa Ross / Elizabeth Rodgers0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Bowes / Mary Turnes vs Dagmar O'Rourke / Margaret Roset1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesUri Covarrubias / Denise Reichenbach vs Denise Agnew / Maki Smith0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesAnn Carlson / Mary Turnes vs Aspen Kahl / Jennifer Myers1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesUri Covarrubias vs Stutti Smit-Johnson2-6, 2-6
2023-04-29vs HIlls/D. Agnew/40&Over4.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesFaith Sincich / Julie Wakefield vs Dagmar O'Rourke / Maki Smith1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElaine Aschenbrenner / Mary Turnes vs Elizabeth Rodgers / Lisa Ross2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesFaith Sincich / Elaine Aschenbrenner vs Sonia Patrick / Julie Martin6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Deborah Nicklaus
published 4.5
4.17
Mariela Saban
published
4.17
Farheen Aldeen
published
4.09
Uyen Tran
published
4.05
4.05
Ann Carlson
published 4.5
3.93
Uri Covarrubias
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Mary Turnes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Tish Wissel
published
3.73
Faith Sincich
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Julie Wakefield
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Deborah Nicklaus
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
Mariela Saban
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
4.17
Farheen Aldeen
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
4.17
Uyen Tran
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
4.09
Elaine Aschenbrenner
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Ann Carlson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
4.05
4
Uri Covarrubias
86W–85L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.93
Mary Turnes
33W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.88
Tish Wissel
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Faith Sincich
39W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Julie Wakefield
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
3.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.