Teams

Sullivan, Ashley

2024 Mixed 18 & Over-JXN · 3.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-24vs Dendy, JosephLost 02
L#2 DoublesStephanie McKnatt / John Luley vs Robbie Armstrong / Claire Simmons4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Sullivan / Philip Herring vs Lindsey Fonville / Christopher Gardner1-6, 3-6
2024-06-23vs Van Dan, JaimeLost 12
W#1 DoublesSam Ivy / Kayla Martin vs Tori Campbell / Jeffrey Silberblatt6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPhilip Herring / Ashley Sullivan vs Asa Barnes / Gracie Weatherly3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesWill Hutchins / Maddie McKnatt vs Aidan Topakoglu / Jaime van Dan2-6, 0-6
2024-06-10vs Williamson, BlairLost 02
L#2 DoublesStephanie McKnatt / Will Hutchins vs India Hemphill / Adam Byrd1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Sullivan / Philip Herring vs Deanna Tubbs / Bradley Thomas0-6, 1-6
2024-05-20vs Biddle, WarrenLost 03
L#1 DoublesSam Ivy / Kayla Martin vs Mark Bradshaw / Jennifer Bradshaw1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMaddie McKnatt / Will Hutchins vs Warren Biddle / Mary Nalder0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Sullivan / Philip Herring vs Kevin Dotson / Sonya Covey5-7, 1-6
2024-05-06vs Medina, ChristianLost 02
L#1 DoublesSam Ivy / Kayla Martin vs Christian Medina / Megan Tyson4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPhilip Herring / Ashley Sullivan vs Avery Sanders / Mary Ivon Montgomery1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

John Luley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kayla Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maddie McKnatt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Philip Herring
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Sam Ivy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie McKnatt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Will Hutchins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sam Ivy + Kayla Martin123 matchesnot enough data
Sam Ivy + Stephanie McKnatt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Luley
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kayla Martin
4W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maddie McKnatt
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Philip Herring
0W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sam Ivy
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephanie McKnatt
7W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Will Hutchins
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.