Teams

A Winning Combo

2025 COMBO · 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-13vs Lady LuxeLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Molloy / Ally Winslow vs Brenda Villarreal / Michelle Gonzalez6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEdie Wright / Kasey Oden vs Chloe Martin / Deborah Lange3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKatie Toppin / Scotty MacDaniel vs Lori Martin / Shelbi Spears0-6, 4-6
2025-04-12vs Tennis and Tito'sWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Molloy / Ally Winslow vs Debbie Starks / Jennifer Yantis6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKatie Vincent / Halli Hollimon vs Cassie Villegas / Karen Smith6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAngel Schneider / Scotty MacDaniel vs Kathy Burkholder / Lindsey Musch6-3, 6-1
2025-04-12vs A Fun ComboWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatie Vincent / Halli Hollimon vs Lathia Bell / Stephanie Woods Reynolds6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSara Stringfellow / Holly DeLaune vs Marissa Kenisky / Paula Gerloff6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesEdie Wright / Kasey Oden vs Stacy Gallo / Marina Henkes6-2, 6-4
2025-04-11vs Dominion DollsLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Molloy / Ally Winslow vs LeeAnn Penelope Ayarzagoitia / Blanca Nelly Rosales6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Markoff - Case / Scotty MacDaniel vs Carmen Ahmed / Molly Miller6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKasey Oden / Sara Stringfellow vs Raquel Hubbert / Ashley Trevino1-6, 3-6
2025-04-11vs Racq PacqWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatie Toppin / Halli Hollimon vs Stacy Berry / Sarah Naylor7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAngel Schneider / Erin Spalten vs Nicole Ward / Amanda Reed0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesErin Seki / Holly DeLaune vs Noemi Copeland / Jami Painter3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Amy Molloy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Katie Markoff - Case
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Katie Vincent
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Edie Wright
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.41
Erin Seki
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Katie Toppin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Sara Stringfellow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Ally Winslow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Angel Schneider
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Kasey Oden
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Halli Hollimon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Erin Spalten
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Holly DeLaune
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Scotty MacDaniel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edie Wright + Katie Markoff - Case5071% games+10.1% vs expected
Katie Vincent + Sara Stringfellow6059% games+6.8% vs expected
Kasey Oden + Scotty MacDaniel9651% games−1.1% vs expected
Katie Vincent + Erin Seki6168% gamesnot enough data
Katie Vincent + Katie Markoff - Case314 matchesnot enough data
Sara Stringfellow + Katie Markoff - Case314 matchesnot enough data
Sara Stringfellow + Katie Toppin213 matchesnot enough data
Sara Stringfellow + Amy Molloy303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Molloy
26W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Katie Markoff - Case
25W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Katie Vincent
32W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Edie Wright
20W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Erin Seki
19W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Katie Toppin
28W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Sara Stringfellow
25W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Ally Winslow
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Angel Schneider
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kasey Oden
21W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.09
3
Halli Hollimon
22W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
Erin Spalten
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Holly DeLaune
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Scotty MacDaniel
19W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.