Teams

MLF YELLOW

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-02vs HMTC GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMolly Skold / Diane Erickson vs Vivian Watson / Marcee Gustafson6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMaka Hammock vs Kimberley Hattem6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2023-05-23vs LT ORANGESplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiane Erickson / Molly Skold vs Tina Spicer / Janice Sale6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Prentice / Maka Hammock vs Deborah Lockwood / Cindy Eisenberg4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-22vs FCCC REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Prentice / Maka Hammock vs Kathleen Tremblay / Tara Delaney2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-05-08vs TAG BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane Erickson / Molly Skold vs Amy Herold / Thora Pabst6-2, 6-2
2023-05-01vs CSU GOLDWon 10
W#2 DoublesMaka Hammock / Susan Prentice vs Kathy Carlson / Tiffany Burns5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-24vs HMTC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesMolly Skold / Diane Erickson vs Susan Seiler / Jennifer Grim6-2, 6-4
2023-04-17vs FCCC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesGeneva Ritsch / Maka Hammock vs Sherry McCoy / Michelle Kennedy6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Maisie Knowles
published
2.92
Maka Hammock
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.80
Ashley Sloan
published 3
2.79
Cindy Short
published 3
2.73
Molly Skold
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Geneva Ritsch
published
Mariana Treat
published
Stacey Hogan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maka Hammock + Molly Skold5263% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Short + Mariana Treat123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maisie Knowles
29W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.55
3
Bettina Cosima Larrarte
39W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Maka Hammock
85W–78L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Ashley Sloan
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Cindy Short
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Molly Skold
45W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Geneva Ritsch
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mariana Treat
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stacey Hogan
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.