Teams

Terrebonne/Slidell/5.5/Aug26

2026 Slidell Southern Combo 40 & Over - Men · 5.5 Slidell (40&O) Men

10 players · average NTRP 2.80 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 17 6:00 PM
Henry J. Calamari Memorial Tennis Center
Sep 24 6:00 PM
Henry J. Calamari Memorial Tennis Center
Oct 1 6:00 PM
Henry J. Calamari Memorial Tennis Center
Oct 8 6:00 PM
Henry J. Calamari Memorial Tennis Center
2026-08-27vs Bernal/2.5-3.0/40/SLI/HJCLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Juneau / Joe Mitchell vs Joseph Bernal / Kelly Lewis1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChris Terrebonne / Kevin Pearson vs Barry Salsbury / Stephen Deep4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Nogueras / James Newcomb vs David Coote / Don Daigrepont4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.5 Slidell (40&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Terrebonne/Slidell/5.5/Aug26000000
2Bernal/2.5-3.0/40/SLI/HJC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Ladson Poole
published
2.86
Joe Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Bill Deshotels
published 3
2.64
David Speyrer
published 3
2.61
Robert Juneau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Chris Terrebonne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.47
Kevin Pearson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
James Newcomb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.16
John Nogueras
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joe Mitchell + Chris Terrebonne123 matchesnot enough data
Ladson Poole + Chris Terrebonne123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ladson Poole
34W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.14
Joe Mitchell
62W–77L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Bill Deshotels
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.80
3
David Speyrer
6W–15L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
Robert Juneau
0W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Chris Terrebonne
5W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.56
Kevin Pearson
7W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
2.5
James Newcomb
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Christopher Villa Jr
0W–13L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.16
John Nogueras
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.