Teams

Ke.DeHaven65M

2025 Capital Mixed 65 & Over · 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-31vs Re.Procter65MLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan King / Wally Hinkleman vs Susan Doninger Greer / Michael Rhaney5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-07-24vs Re.Procter65MSplit 11
L#2 DoublesFran Ange / Steven Anderson vs Rebecca Procter / Robert Kent0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMindy Dehaven / Ken Dehaven vs Sharon Foster / Michael Rhaney6-4, 6-0
2025-07-03vs Re.Procter65MLost 02
L#2 DoublesSusan King / Wally Hinkleman vs Alan Crews / Rebecca Procter1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMichell Wilson / Rhett Hartley vs Susan Doninger Greer / Michael Rhaney1-6, 3-6
2025-06-26vs Re.Procter65MWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichell Wilson / Rhett Hartley vs Alan Crews / Rebecca Procter4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFran Ange / Steven Anderson vs Susan Doninger Greer / Robert Kent5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan King / Wally Hinkleman vs Kenneth Gillespie / Sharon Foster7-5, 6-4
2025-06-19vs Re.Procter65MLost 02
L#1 DoublesKen Dehaven / Mindy Dehaven vs Rebecca Procter / Alan Crews2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMichell Wilson / Steven Anderson vs Robert Kent / Sharon Foster5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-12vs Re.Procter65MWon 21
L#1 DoublesFran Ange / Steven Anderson vs Rebecca Procter / Alan Crews3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMichell Wilson / William Weis vs Sharon Foster / John Bruckel3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRonnie Todd / Wally Hinkleman vs Tiare Smiley / Kenneth Gillespie6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-05-22vs Re.Procter65MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesFran Ange / William Weis vs Rebecca Procter / Alan Crews2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSusan King / Wally Hinkleman vs Susan Doninger Greer / Michael Rhaney7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Mindy Dehaven
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Ken Dehaven
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.49
Wally Hinkleman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.48
Rhett Hartley
published
3.46
Michell Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Fran Ange
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Linda Carroll
published
3.24
Steven Wilson
published
3.22
William Weis
published
Ronnie Todd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mindy Dehaven + Ken Dehaven131647% gamesnot enough data
Steven Wilson + Michell Wilson224 matchesnot enough data
Michell Wilson + Ken Dehaven314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mindy Dehaven
23W–41L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
3.5
Ken Dehaven
94W–89L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Wally Hinkleman
31W–50L career · type S · 5 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Rhett Hartley
11W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Michell Wilson
52W–53L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Fran Ange
74W–100L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Linda Carroll
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Steven Wilson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
William Weis
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Ronnie Todd
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.