Teams

Payne Park Wilson Trilevel

2023 Sarasota Trilevel Summer Weekend · 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.10 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#2 DoublesLorie Gianos / Tanya Kelly vs Sheila Perry / Nia Esposito6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-09-09vs Cedars Island SharksSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Wilson / Tami Dalto vs Kinsey Robb / Pat Brugger6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKara Beene / Nancy Finman vs Wendy Hillock / Vickie Miller4-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesSally Alford / Tami Dalto vs Allyson Hoffman / Lauren Ash7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLorie Gianos / Yudi Carpenter vs Sandy Severs / Karen Nicholson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-19vs Cedars Island SharksWon 20
W#1 DoublesSally Alford / Tami Dalto vs Pat Brugger / Kinsey Robb5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKara Beene / Nancy Finman vs Wendy Hillock / SueAnn Sanders6-4, 7-5
L#1 DoublesMary Wilson / Tami Dalto vs Allyson Hoffman / Elizabeth Green4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTanya Kelly / Manda Jordan vs Megan McAloon / Gina Hagopian4-6, 6-7
2023-07-16vs Cedars Island SharksWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Wilson / Tami Dalto vs Jennifer Bright / Cindy Fancher6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesYudi Carpenter / Lorie Gianos vs Kristin Knous / Cathy Pizzo7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKara Beene / Nancy Finman vs Megan McAloon / Sandy Severs4-6, 3-6
2023-07-08vs Cedars Island SharksWon 10
W#2 DoublesYudi Carpenter / Lorie Gianos vs Kristin Knous / Vickie Miller6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Sally Alford
published
4.17
Tami Dalto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.95
Yudi Carpenter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.91
Kara Beene
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Nancy Finman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Emily Franklin
published 4
3.59
Roberta Smith
published
3.41
Sandra Poston
published
Tanya Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kara Beene + Nancy Finman705552% games−2.4% vs expected
Tanya Kelly + Yudi Carpenter314 matchesnot enough data
Tami Dalto + Yudi Carpenter033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sally Alford
14W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Tami Dalto
54W–85L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
4.17
4
Yudi Carpenter
218W–131L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Kara Beene
240W–153L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Nancy Finman
138W–95L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Emily Franklin
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
Roberta Smith
13W–23L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Sandra Poston
48W–39L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.41
Tanya Kelly
65W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.