Teams

McKee-CC

2026 CORTA 65 & Over Mixed Doubles Regional Championships · 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-22vs Morris-CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrea Bingham / Julio Gonzalez vs John Morris / Becky Overby1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDarlene Graham / James Rains vs David Morris / Sally Clay Smith0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPat Majestic / Jerry Jones vs Walter Henry / Sheila Ezell4-6, 4-6
2026-03-22vs Morris-CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesSylvia Mckee / James Rains vs David Barrett / Missy Mizzell1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Gibson / Doug Gibson vs Stephen Magner / Rhonda Ramey0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDarlene Graham / Steve Earles vs Mark Kamensky / Valorie Harbour4-6, 1-6
2026-03-21vs Morris-CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatricia Gibson / Doug Gibson vs John Morris / Rhonda Ramey1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKay Gantt / Ron Diamond vs David Morris / Sally Clay Smith5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSylvia Mckee / Jerry Jones vs Mark Kamensky / Valorie Harbour4-6, 3-6
2026-03-21vs Morris-CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJamie Smith / Julio Gonzalez vs David Barrett / Missy Mizzell0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Bingham / Steve Earles vs Walter Henry / Sheila Ezell6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDarlene Graham / James Rains vs Stephen Magner / Becky Overby3-6, 2-6
2026-03-20vs Morris-CCLost 02
L#1 DoublesSylvia Mckee / Steve Earles vs John Morris / Sheila Ezell2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPat Majestic / Julio Gonzalez vs Walter Henry / Becky Overby3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Morris-CC50150159
2McKee-CC0501530179

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Doug Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
James Rains
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Sylvia Mckee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Kay Gantt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Andrea Bingham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Pat Majestic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Darlene Graham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Julio Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Watson Mathis
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Doug Gibson
14W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.06
James Rains
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
Sylvia Mckee
24W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Kay Gantt
42W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Andrea Bingham
34W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Pat Majestic
15W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%6%94%
2.72
3
Darlene Graham
29W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Julio Gonzalez
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Watson Mathis
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.