Teams

Grey Hawk - M.Maggal

2022 Collier Adult 55 & Over Fall · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-06vs Marco YMCA - B. SwansonLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Dina Viteretti vs Jennifer Ball / Stephanie Opel2-6, 5-7
2021-11-29vs Cambier - GustWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Rae Fairfield vs Corey Stranger / Kristy Cardina6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-11-22Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Dina Viteretti vs Debra Bowenkamp / Annette Brennan4-6, 0-6
2021-11-15vs Pelican Bay Park - NavarroLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Jess / Michelle Maggal vs Lori Coates / Angela Springer2-6, 4-6
2021-11-08vs Naples Grande - J. FrankLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Jill Hulbert vs Ann Manning / Karen McGuire2-6, 4-6
2021-11-04vs Pelican Bay Park - N. BlackWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Rae Fairfield vs Hildy Glick / Nancy Black7-5, 6-2
2021-11-01vs Players Club - J. WautersWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Dina Viteretti vs Crystie Ciriello / Sherry Cummings6-2, 6-4
2021-10-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Judith Tenaglia vs Barbara Tilley / Constance Buck2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Rae Fairfield
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Donna Curry
published 4
3.56
Beth Rainey
published 3.5
3.41
Dina Viteretti
published 3.5
3.32
Michelle Maggal
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rae Fairfield
51W–25L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Donna Curry
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Beth Rainey
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Dina Viteretti
12W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Michelle Maggal
169W–159L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.