Teams

McDaniel/Memphis

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 6.5 18 & Over Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-23vs Kinney/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessie Williams / Audrey Darrohn vs Morgan Burton / Crista Mcmorran6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKiersten Carey / Sumner Jefferson vs Janet Grillis / Barbara Halliburton3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Kirton / Hart Kelman vs Angie Moore / Jodi Kendall4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-16vs Grear/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesJessica McDaniel / Mackenzie Harbin vs Meredith Canale / Christian Turner4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAllie Sloane / Hart Kelman vs Amy Poag / Dory Gaston3-6, 1-6
2026-08-09vs Bann/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesWhitney Williams / Tricia Murphy Adkins vs Morgan Pippen / Omitope Taylor6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHart Kelman / Devra Hampton vs Cheryl Body / Grace Bann3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSumner Jefferson / Megan Dillon vs Kathlene Poulelis / Autumn Rich0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Devra Hampton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Jessica McDaniel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Tricia Murphy Adkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Mackenzie Harbin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Sumner Jefferson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Allie Sloane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Audrey Darrohn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Kiersten Carey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Ann Church
published 3
2.41
2.38
Hart Kelman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kiersten Carey + Hart Kelman134 matchesnot enough data
Jessica McDaniel + Mackenzie Harbin123 matchesnot enough data
Jessica McDaniel + Tricia Murphy Adkins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Devra Hampton
31W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Jessica McDaniel
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Tricia Murphy Adkins
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Mackenzie Harbin
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Sumner Jefferson
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Allie Sloane
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.58
3
Audrey Darrohn
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.52
Kiersten Carey
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Ann Church
3W–11L career · no lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.42
2.5
Alexandra Willis Boddie
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
Hart Kelman
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.