Teams

Parkland/Marcelin

2025 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Night · 4.5 Adult 18 & Over Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.39 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-12vs WestonHills/MarcanoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAntonio Marcelin / Matthew Kramer vs Alejandro Izquierdo / JORGE YEGRES1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDaniel Dames / Guillaume Gerardin vs Alan Matheus / Victor Caba5-7, 4-6
2025-06-04vs Veltri/ValenciaWon 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Kramer / Jonathan Malta vs Ramon Hudec / Federico Valencia7-5, 6-2
2025-05-29vs BocaSwim/SerbanescuLost 12
L#1 SinglesMatthew Kramer vs Tim Carey5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAntonio Marcelin / David Williams vs Jace Koretz / Jordan Crance1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesGuillaume Gerardin / Daniel Dames vs James Taylor / Greg Brusey7-6, 6-2
2025-05-15vs Broward/Prado/18&OverM4.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAntonio Marcelin / Matthew Kramer vs Kenny Torrellas / Kyle Stump4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Dames / Cesar Abdu vs Chase Grainger / GUILLERMO TORRELLAS0-6, 3-6
2025-05-08vs WestonHills/MarcanoLost 03
L#1 DoublesAntonio Marcelin / Daniel Dames vs Hugo Moreno / Diego Pena Blanco2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMatthew Kramer vs Miguel Tortolero2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAtif Raoof / Joe Moosa vs Alejandro Izquierdo / JORGE YEGRES2-6, 2-6
2025-04-24vs BocaSwim/SerbanescuLost 03
L#1 DoublesAtif Raoof / Matthew Kramer vs Tim Carey / Jace Koretz1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGuillaume Gerardin / Antonio Marcelin vs Jason Rothstein / Kai Blache2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Dames / Cesar Abdu vs Greg Brusey / James Taylor3-6, 4-6
2025-04-17vs Veltri/ValenciaWon 21
W#2 DoublesAntonio Marcelin / Guillaume Gerardin vs Jared Lehn / Tedd Rosinsky6-4, 7-6
L#2 SinglesMatthew Kramer vs Pawel Andrzejewski6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAndersson Perilla / Michael Kattan vs Andre Sophia / Enzo Zarrillo7-6, 7-6
2025-04-10vs Broward/Prado/18&OverM4.5Lost 12
W#1 SinglesMatthew Kramer vs Emmanuel Naranjo4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAntonio Marcelin / Jonathan Malta vs Dario Spilkin / Chase Grainger4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAndersson Perilla / Michael Kattan vs Pedro Ramirez / Santiago Carranza2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & Over Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
T Dienes
published 4.5
4.38
Bruce Kurtz
published 4.5
4.34
Matthew Kramer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
4.34
Segundo Decotto
published
4.32
Jonathan Malta
published 4.5
4.29
Ronen Bickel
published
4.17
Antonio Marcelin
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.12
Kevin Phuong Nguyen
published
4.10
Daniel Dames
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 21% · published 4.5
4.08
Atif Raoof
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.08
Joe Moosa
published
4.07
David Williams
published 4.5
3.86
Michael Kattan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.79
Francisco Romano
published
3.72
Andersson Perilla
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Segundo Decotto + Bruce Kurtz6455% games+3.3% vs expected
T Dienes + Bruce Kurtz7454% games−3.9% vs expected
Daniel Dames + Antonio Marcelin2540% gamesnot enough data
Atif Raoof + Antonio Marcelin134 matchesnot enough data
Atif Raoof + Bruce Kurtz224 matchesnot enough data
Michael Kattan + Andersson Perilla134 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Dames + Andersson Perilla303 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Dames + Francisco Romano123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
T Dienes
88W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.39
4.5
Bruce Kurtz
82W–59L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
4.38
Matthew Kramer
79W–52L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
4.34
Segundo Decotto
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
4.34
4.5
Jonathan Malta
49W–31L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
Ronen Bickel
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Antonio Marcelin
87W–111L career · 7 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
Kevin Phuong Nguyen
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
4.12
4.5
Daniel Dames
37W–70L career · type D · 13 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Atif Raoof
106W–101L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
Joe Moosa
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
4.08
4.5
David Williams
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Michael Kattan
212W–110L career · type A · 10 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
Francisco Romano
30W–21L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Andersson Perilla
143W–110L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.