Teams

SDNC LLW 4.5 Lomas Santa Fe CC/ Watkins

2025 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC WE · SDNC

14 players · average NTRP 4.30 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-23vs SDNC 4.5 RPTC(2:2)/ IshiharaLost 01
L#3 DoublesKie Wilcox / David Schissel vs Kenny Hawkins / Andrew Nguyen1-6, 1-6
2025-02-09vs SDNC 4.5 SDTC(3:1)/ MartinezLost 01
L#1 SinglesDavid Schissel vs Suhas Radhakrishna2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesThomas Savides / Robert Prendergast vs Tushar Menon / Russell Silberstein2-6, 4-6
2025-01-12vs SDNC 4.5 KCP(2:2)/ BuggsLost 01
L#1 SinglesThomas Savides vs James Lievers1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Abe Roder
published 4.5
4.23
Alex Barnett
published 4.5
4.09
Matthew Comyns
published 4.5
3.74
David Schissel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Keith Greener
published
3.58
Thomas Savides
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Grant Watkins
published
Jacob Boone
published
James Koontz
published
Kie Wilcox
published
Kirk Spahn
published
Mark Volkmann
published
Robert Prendergast
published
Todd Johansen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Comyns + Thomas Savides01131% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Comyns + David Schissel1541% gamesnot enough data
David Schissel + Thomas Savides044 matchesnot enough data
Robert Prendergast + James Koontz134 matchesnot enough data
Todd Johansen + Grant Watkins213 matchesnot enough data
Jacob Boone + Grant Watkins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Abe Roder
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
4.42
4.5
Alex Barnett
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Matthew Comyns
35W–60L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.09
4
David Schissel
12W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Keith Greener
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Thomas Savides
23W–70L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Grant Watkins
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jacob Boone
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
James Koontz
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kie Wilcox
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kirk Spahn
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Volkmann
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Prendergast
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Todd Johansen
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.